Poster No:
910
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Patrick Hewan1, Alfie Wearn2, Roel van Dooren3, Lindsay Wyatt1, Ilana Leppert4, Giulia Baracchini5, Colleen Hughes2, Jennifer Tremblay-Mercier6, Elisabeth Sylvain6, Judes Poirier6, Sylvia Villeneuve7, Christine Tardif4, R. Nathan Spreng8, Gary Turner1
Institutions:
1York University, Toronto, Ontario, 2McGill University, Montreal, Québec, 3Institutes of Psychology & Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, The Netherlands, Leiden, South Holland, 4McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, 5Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, 6Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Québec, 7Brain Imaging Centre, Douglas Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Qc, 8Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Roel van Dooren
Institutes of Psychology & Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Leiden, South Holland
Ilana Leppert
McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Montreal, Quebec
Judes Poirier
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Montreal, Québec
Sylvia Villeneuve
Brain Imaging Centre, Douglas Institute Research Centre
Montreal, Qc
Christine Tardif
McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Montreal, Quebec
R. Nathan Spreng
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University
Montreal, Quebec
Introduction:
The exploration-exploitation (EE) trade-off is a decision-making process that relies on cortical regions involved in reward processing and monitoring, and their integration with subcortical nuclei involved in attention and learning1. In recent work, we used quantitative MRI (qMRI) to examine the microstructural integrity of the locus coeruleus (LC), a core subcortical node in the EE circuit, and showed that this brain measure robustly predicts performance on a foraging-based measure of EE2. Here, we investigated whether a similar relationship exists across cortical regions implicated in EE, examining cellular microstructure as related to foraging performance in medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), rostral middle frontal gyrus (rMFG), frontopolar cortex (FPC), and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC)-core cortical regions identified in a recent meta-analysis from our lab3 and related theoretical models1,4. We predicted that lower integrity would be associated with sub-optimal decision-making performance, marked by an exploitation-bias in older adulthood5.
Methods:
PARTICIPANTS: 132 cognitively healthy older adults (mean age 70s, 68% female) from the PREVENT-AD cohort6.
BEHAVIORAL TASK7: A computerized foraging task. Participants control an avatar and forage for points within 5 minutes. NEUROIMAGING PROTOCOL: MRI scans were acquired on a 3T Siemens PrismaFit including: T1w MPRAGE (1mm isotropic, TR/TE/TI=2300/2.96/900ms, FA=9°); Three multi-echo sequences (1mm isotropic, total TA=17:30) with predominant weighting for: T1 (TR=18ms, 6 echoes, TE=2.16-14.81ms, FA 20°), magnetization transfer (MT) (TR=27ms, 6 echoes, TE=2.04-14.89ms, FA 6°, MT pulse FA 540°, 2.2kHz off-resonance, 12.8ms) and proton density (TR=27ms, 8 echoes, TE=2.04-22.20ms, echo-spacing=2.57ms, FA 6°). IMAGE PROCESSING: MTsat maps were calculated using the hMRI toolbox8. Cortical ROIs were defined using the Desikan-Killiany atlas9.
ANALYSIS: Marginal value theorem determined optimal foraging performance on a group level10. Partial correlations were conducted between core regions, a cortical control region not predicted to be associated with EE, and foraging performance. Partial correlations controlled for age, gender, education, brain volume, cortical thickness in each ROI, and MTsat in the corpus callosum to control for generalized age-related changes in MTsat.
Results:
MTsat values in the mOFC, rMFG, and FPC were significantly correlated with task performance (mOFC: pr(126) = 0.19, p < 0.05; rMFG: pr(126) = 0.25, p < 0.01, FPC: pr(126) = 0.19, p < 0.05 while dACC was not significant (pr(126) = 0.14, p = 0.13). Additionally, there was no correlation between MTsat and foraging performance in the lateral occipital cortex (LO; pr(126) = 0.07, p= 0.4), a region we predicted not to be associated with foraging performance.
Conclusions:
We examined whether the integrity of core cortical regions previously implicated in EE decision-making is associated with performance on a foraging task. As predicted, qMRI-derived MTsat values were significantly and positively correlated with EE decision-making in the mOFC, rMFG, and FPC, with a similar trend observed for dACC, all core EE decision-making nodes. In contrast, MTsat in the LO, a cortical control region not previously implicated in EE, was not related to EE performance. Specifically, lower MTsat values in EE regions were associated with increased exploitation, replicating a recent finding in LC2. Critically, no behavioural associations were observed with grey matter volume in these EE regions, nor when controlling for volumes in our correlation models with MTsat. MTsat as measured by qMRI is a promising marker of the integrity of this cortico-subcortical circuit, providing a novel lens on the neural mechanisms underlying changes in decision-making performance, and the emergence of a exploitation bias in later life5.
Higher Cognitive Functions:
Decision Making 1
Lifespan Development:
Aging 2
Keywords:
Aging
STRUCTURAL MRI
Other - QUANTITATIVE MRI
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
1. Cohen, J. D. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philos.Trans.R.Soc.Lond.B. 362, 933-942.
2. Turner, R. G. (2023). Lower microstructural integrity of locus coeruleus is associated with an exploitative decision-making bias in older adults. Submitted.
3. Wyatt, L. (2023). Exploration versus exploitation decisions in the human brain: A systematic review of functional neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies. Neuropsychologia (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108740
4. Aston-Jones, G. (2005). Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. Journal of Computational Neurology. 493, 99-110.
5. Spreng, R. N. (2021). From exploration to exploitation: a shifting mental mode in late life development. Trends in cognitive sciences 25, 1058-1071
6. Tremblay-Mercier, J. (2021) Open science datasets from PREVENT-AD, a longitudinal cohort of presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage. Clinical 31, 102733
7. van Dooren, R. (2021). The exploration-exploitation trade-off in a foraging task is affected by mood-related arousal and valence. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 21, 549-560
8. Tabelow, K. (2019). hMRI - A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research. NeuroImage 194, 191-210.
9. Desikan, S. R. (2006). An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage. 31, 968-980
10. Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theories in Population Biology. 9, 129-136.