Poster No:
1843
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Jan Valosek1,2,3,4, Petr Hluštík5,6, Tomáš Horák7,8, Magda Horáková7,8, Josef Bednařík7,8
Institutions:
1NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, 2Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Canada, 3Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 4Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 5Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 6Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 7Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, 8Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
First Author:
Jan Valosek
NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal|Mila - Quebec AI Institute|Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc|Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc
Montreal, Quebec|Montreal, Canada|Olomouc, Czech Republic|Olomouc, Czech Republic
Co-Author(s):
Petr Hluštík
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University|Department of Neurology, University Hospital
Olomouc, Czech Republic|Olomouc, Czech Republic
Tomáš Horák
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University|Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brno
Brno, Czech Republic|Brno, Czech Republic
Magda Horáková
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University|Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brno
Brno, Czech Republic|Brno, Czech Republic
Josef Bednařík
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University|Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brno
Brno, Czech Republic|Brno, Czech Republic
Introduction:
Spinal cord morphometric measures computed from magnetic resonance (MRI) images, such as cross-sectional area and anteroposterior diameter, are widely used to assess the severity of spinal cord compression (Badhiwala et al. 2020). The longitudinal monitoring of the compression severity might play an important role in the surgical management of participants with asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression, particularly prior to the progression to degenerative cervical myelopathy. However, due to difficulties in robustly co-registering spinal cord MRI images across sessions, the longitudinal MRI evaluation is usually performed on morphometric measures aggregated across multiple levels, such as vertebral levels C2-C3 (David et al. 2021). As compression typically occurs in proximity to the intervertebral discs spanning two adjacent vertebral levels, the averaging across levels can thus impact compression parameters. In this study, we perform a longitudinal assessment of compression severity using a recently proposed normalization approach bringing morphometric measures from different sessions into common anatomical dimensions (Valošek et al. 2023).
Methods:
3T T2-weighted images covering the cervical spinal cord were acquired in 59 participants with asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression. Participants were scanned longitudinally with an interval of 36 months between measurements. Image processing was done with the Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT, v6.1) (De Leener et al. 2017). For each participant, the spinal cord was segmented using a deep learning-based algorithm trained on spinal cord injury patients (https://github.com/ivadomed/model_seg_sci), the vertebral levels were identified (Ullmann et al. 2014), and morphometric measures were normalized to the PAM50 anatomical dimensions (Valošek et al. 2023). The following morphometric measures were used: cross-sectional area, anteroposterior diameter, transverse diameter, compression ratio, eccentricity, and solidity.
Results:
Figure 1 shows morphometric measures for three participants with asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression (A: female, 53 y.o., B: female, 58 y.o., C: male, 53 y.o.). For each participant, the morphometric measures from both sessions are shown in the same anatomical dimensions of the PAM50 spinal cord template. The morphometric measures are plotted across individual axial slices with vertebral levels identified on the plot. The figure also shows (in gray color) normative values computed from a database of 203 healthy controls (Valošek et al. 2023).
For the whole patient group, the evolution of morphometric parameters over the follow-up interval of approximately 3 years appears quite heterogeneous. Several scenarios may be observed: First, in ~37% of the patients, the morphometry remains stable, without signs of either worsening or improvement. This may confirm the test-retest stability of the methodology. Second, ~42% of the patients present with worsening cord compression, either more pronounced compression in one segment or a new compression in another segment). Finally, ~20% of patients' compression seems to improve, so that the morphometric measures return to the normal range.

·Figure 1
Conclusions:
In conclusion, this study employs a normalization approach to longitudinally assess compression severity in participants with cervical spinal cord compression. Bringing morphometric measures from different sessions into common anatomical dimensions facilitates an assessment of all individual axial slices without averaging across levels. Subsequent work will focus on the validation of inter-session variability and correlation with patients' clinical status progression.
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Image Registration and Computational Anatomy 1
Segmentation and Parcellation 2
Keywords:
Segmentation
Spatial Normalization
Spinal Cord
STRUCTURAL MRI
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Badhiwala, Jetan H., Christopher S. Ahuja, Muhammad A. Akbar, Christopher D. Witiw, Farshad Nassiri, Julio C. Furlan, Armin Curt, Jefferson R. Wilson, and Michael G. Fehlings. 2020. “Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy - Update and Future Directions.” Nature Reviews. Neurology 16 (2): 108–24.
David, Gergely, Dario Pfyffer, Kevin Vallotton, Nikolai Pfender, Alan Thompson, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Siawoosh Mohammadi, Armin Curt, and Patrick Freund. 2021. “Longitudinal Changes of Spinal Cord Grey and White Matter Following Spinal Cord Injury.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, no. i (August): jnnp – 2021–326337.
De Leener, Benjamin, Simon Lévy, Sara M. Dupont, Vladimir S. Fonov, Nikola Stikov, D. Louis Collins, Virginie Callot, and Julien Cohen-Adad. 2017. “SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an Open-Source Software for Processing Spinal Cord MRI Data.” NeuroImage 145 (Pt A): 24–43.
Ullmann, Eugénie, Jean François Pelletier Paquette, William E. Thong, and Julien Cohen-Adad. 2014. “Automatic Labeling of Vertebral Levels Using a Robust Template-Based Approach.” International Journal of Biomedical Imaging 2014: 719520.
Valošek, Jan, Sandrine Bédard, Miloš Keřkovský, Tomáš Rohan, and Julien Cohen-Adad. 2023. “A Database of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord Morphometry in the PAM50 Template Space.” NeuroLibre 3 (34): 17.