Poster No:
1693
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Kyeongseon Min1, Jongho Lee1
Institutions:
1Seoul National University, Seoul, Seoul
First Author:
Co-Author:
Introduction:
χ-separation (chi-separation) is an advanced quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) technique that jointly utilizes tissue phase and transverse relaxation rate (R2* and R2) maps to separate paramagnetic (χpara) and diamagnetic susceptibility (χdia) contributions in QSM (Shin, 2021). Inaccurate tissue field or R2* (or R2) maps may result in erroneous χpara and χdia maps. When creating a tissue field map, background field from susceptibility difference (e.g. air-tissue interface) and incomplete shimming is removed by applying background field removal techniques (Liu, 2011) to the phase of gradient-echo data. Background field variation also causes intravoxel dephasing, resulting in magnitude modulation of gradient-echo data and overestimation of R2* (Ordidge, 1994). Therefore, this additional R2*, named as background R2*, should be corrected when conducting χ-separation to prevent potential bias in χpara and χdia maps. In this study, we demonstrated that background R2* correction can reduce artifactual overestimation of χpara and χdia. Moreover, we examined the effect of background R2* correction under varying k-space filtering, confirming that background R2* correction leads to consistent χ-separation maps across different k-space filtering.
Methods:
A healthy volunteer was scanned using Siemens 3 T MRI with a 3D multi-echo gradient-echo sequence and a 2D multi-echo spin-echo sequence. The effect of intravoxel field gradient on 3D multi-echo gradient-echo data was modelled using voxel spread function method (Yablonskiy, 2013). In this model, the modulated signal from a voxel by linearly varying intravoxel field can be expressed as multiplication with a shifted sinc function in k-space, where the shift is proportional to the intravoxel field gradient. The voxel spread function can be calculated by inverse Fourier transform of this shifted sinc function. When k-space data is filtered with a windowing function, the effect of windowing can be accommodated by multiplying the shifted sinc function with the windowing function.
The schematic flowchart of background R2* correction for χ-separation is presented in Fig. 1. First, the field gradient was estimated from the numerical gradient of combined phase of multi-echo gradient-echo data. The voxel spread function was calculated from the field gradient map. Using this voxel spread function, the magnitude modulation by the field gradient was estimated, and utilized to generate a background-corrected R2* map. For χ-separation, a tissue field map was prepared by removing background field from the combine phase map (Wu, 2012). The R2 map were derived from the multi-echo spin-echo data. Finally, χpara and χdia maps were acquired with χ-sepnet (Kim, 2022) utilizing the corrected or uncorrected R2*, R2, and tissue field maps as inputs.

Results:
In Fig. 2A, the effect of background R2* correction on χpara and χdia maps were examined at the regions close to air cavities. While uncorrected χpara and χdia maps exhibited overestimation at regions marked with cyan lines, corrected χpara and χdia values were in normal ranges, as confirmed by the χpara, χdia, and R2* profile, which was plotted along cyan lines. Overall, the χpara and χdia bias from background R2* at regions close to nasal, frontal, and tympanic cavities were properly reduced in the corrected χpara and χdia maps. In Fig. 2B, the same k-space data was reconstructed after Tukey-windowing with different low-pass level. By applying background R2* correction, the overestimation in χpara and χdia was corrected, providing more consistent χpara and χdia maps across different low-pass levels.
Conclusions:
Background R2* correction for χ-separation successfully reduced overestimation in χpara and χdia maps. As MRI vendors provide reconstructed images at different low-pass levels, the background R2* differs vendor-to-vendor. Therefore, applying background R2* correction is crucial for consistent χ-separation maps across venders.
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Exploratory Modeling and Artifact Removal 1
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Subcortical Structures
White Matter Anatomy, Fiber Pathways and Connectivity 2
Keywords:
Modeling
Myelin
STRUCTURAL MRI
Thalamus
WHITE MATTER IMAGING - DTI, HARDI, DSI, ETC
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Kim, M. (2022). "Chi-sepnet: Susceptibility source separation using deep neural network." Proceedings of International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 30: 2464.
Liu, T. (2011). "A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF)." NMR in Biomedicine 24: 1129-1136.
Ordidge, R.J. (1994). "Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2-weighted and T2*-weighted MRI at 3 tesla." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 32: 335-341.
Schweser, F. (2011). "Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: An approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism?" NeuroImage 54: 2789-2807.
Shin, H.-G. (2021). "χ-separation: Magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain." NeuroImage 240: 118371.
Wu, B. (2012). "Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 67: 137-147.
Yablonskiy, D.A. (2013). "Voxel Spread Function Method for Correction of Magnetic Field Inhomogeneity Effects in Quantitative Gradient-Echo-Based MRI." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 70(5): 1283-1292.