The role of hippocampal subfield volumes in subjective cognitive decline

Poster No:

281 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Linda MAH1, Susan Vandermorris2, Nicolaas Verhoeff3, Nathan Herrmann4

Institutions:

1Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 2Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, 3Baycrest, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 4Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

First Author:

Linda MAH, MD, MHS, FRCPC  
Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario

Co-Author(s):

Susan Vandermorris  
Baycrest
Toronto, Ontario
Nicolaas Verhoeff  
Baycrest, University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario
Nathan Herrmann  
Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario

Introduction:

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD), defined as perception of memory or other cognitive decline with normal test performance, is conceptualized as a possible preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD) (1). Hippocampal volume reduction is well-established as a biomarker of AD risk (2). The hippocampal complex includes functionally and structurally distinct subfields (cornu ammonis (CA), dentate gyrus, and subiculum) which show selective atrophy in aging and in AD (3), as well as psychiatric conditions such as major depressive disorder (4). Previous work demonstrating patterns of subfield atrophy in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a prodrome of AD, support the utility of hippocampal subfield volumetry, over measurement of total hippocampus, to detect risk for AD (5).

Evidence of volumetric alterations in hippocampal subfields in SCD is emerging but inconsistent (6; 7). One potential reason for the discrepancy in findings is unaccounted previous diagnosis of depression in SCD participants. Depression frequently co-occurs with SCD (1) and itself is associated with hippocampal atrophy, yet the majority of studies of SCD failed to ascertain the presence of previous depression. In the current study, we measured hippocampal subfield volumes using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla with the goals of identifying group differences in subfield volumes between older adults with SCD, who were free of current or past depression, and cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults, and examining associations between hippocampal subfield volumes and subjective memory ability.

Methods:

The sample included 26 SCD (13M, age 70.6 SD=5.1 years) and 25 CU (10M, age 71.4 SD=7.4 years) older adults. All participants performed within normal on a neuropsychological battery and screened negative for past or current psychiatric illnesses during psychiatric assessment. SCD was established based on affirmative responses to "Do you feel your memory is becoming worse?" "If so, are you concerned?"(1). Subjective memory ability was further quantified using the Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ)(8) MR scanning was performed on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner using a 12-channel head coil. A high-resolution (voxel size 0.43 x 0.43 x 3 mm) T2-weighted scan of the medial temporal lobe was acquired in an oblique-coronal plane, perpendicular to the hippocampal long axis. The Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) processing pipeline was used to extract bilateral CA1, CA2, CA3, dentate gyrus, and subiculum volumes (9). Independent t-tests were used to compare hippocampal subfields between groups. Partial correlations were performed within the total sample to examine the association between subfield volumes and MFQ Frequency of Forgetting ("How often do you...?") subscale scores, which has been linked to AD neuroimaging markers,(10) as well as long delayed recall scores on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-LDR). Covariates were age, sex, and total intracranial volume. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied.

Results:

Compared to CU, left CA2 volume was reduced in SCD [t (49) = 2.00, P =.025], while right CA3 volume was greater in SCD [t (49) = -1.81, P =.038] (Figure 1), although these findings were not statistically significant following correction for multiple comparisons. Frequency of Forgetting was significantly correlated with left CA2 [r = .42, P =.003] and right subicular volume [r = .45, P =.001. In contrast, CVLT-LDR was not correlated with any hippocampal subfield volume (Figure 2).
Supporting Image: Figure1final.gif
   ·Group differences in hippocampal subfield volumes. CU = cognitively unimpaired; SCD = subjective cognitive decline. CA=cornu ammonis. L=left; R=right.
Supporting Image: Figure2cropped.gif
   ·Associations between right subicular volume and subjective memory (Memory Functioning Questionnaire Frequency of Forgetting subscale score) and objective memory within total sample. CVLT = California
 

Conclusions:

These findings suggest a role for CA2, a region linked to social memory in animal models, in SCD. The association between volume of subiculum, a region implicated in AD, and subjective, but not objective memory, suggests that self-awareness of change in memory in everyday life may be sensitive to subtle disease-related volumetric changes within the hippocampus in the earliest stages of the AD course.

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodegenerative/ Late Life (eg. Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s) 1

Higher Cognitive Functions:

Higher Cognitive Functions Other

Learning and Memory:

Learning and Memory Other 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Anatomical MRI

Keywords:

HIGH FIELD MR
Memory
Neurological
STRUCTURAL MRI

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

Amariglio RE, Becker JA, Carmasin J, Wadsworth LP, Lorius N, et al. 2012. Subjective cognitive complaints and amyloid burden in cognitively normal older individuals. Neuropsychologia 50: 2880-6 (citation 10)
Apostolova LG, Dutton RA, Dinov ID, Hayashi KM, Toga AW, et al. 2006. Conversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer Disease Predicted by Hippocampal Atrophy Maps. Archives of neurology 63: 693-99 (citation 2)
Hansen N, Singh A, Bartels C, Brosseron F, Buerger K, et al. 2021. Hippocampal and Hippocampal-Subfield Volumes From Early-Onset Major Depression and Bipolar Disorder to Cognitive Decline. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (citation 4)
Huang Y, Huang L, Wang Y, Liu Y, Lo C-YZ, Guo Q. 2022. Differential associations of visual memory with hippocampal subfields in subjective cognitive decline and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatrics 22: 153 (citation 7)
Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Buckley RF, van der Flier WM, Han Y, et al. 2020. The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. The Lancet Neurology 19: 271-78 (citation 1)
Mueller SG, Schuff N, Yaffe K, Madison C, Miller B, Weiner MW. 2010. Hippocampal atrophy patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Human brain mapping 31: 1339-47 (citation 5)
Nadal L, Coupé P, Helmer C, Manjon JV, Amieva H, et al. 2020. Differential annualized rates of hippocampal subfields atrophy in aging and future Alzheimer's clinical syndrome. Neurobiology of aging 90: 75-83 (citation 3)
Perrotin A, de Flores R, Lamberton F, Poisnel G, La Joie R, et al. 2015. Hippocampal Subfield Volumetry and 3D Surface Mapping in Subjective Cognitive Decline. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 48: S141-S50 (citation 6)
Yushkevich PA, Pluta JB, Wang H, Xie L, Ding SL, et al. 2015. Automated volumetry and regional thickness analysis of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal cortical structures in mild cognitive impairment. Human brain mapping 36: 258-87 (citation 9)
Zelinski EM, Gilewski MJ, Anthony-Bergstone CR. 1990. Memory Functioning Questionnaire: concurrent validity with memory performance and self-reported memory failures. Psychology and aging 5: 388-99 (citation 8)