Reduced putamen activity precedes placebo analgesia: individual participant data meta-analysis

Poster No:

2522 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Balint Kincses1, Tamás Spisák2, Tor Wager3, Ulrike Bingel4, Placebo Imaging Consortium5

Institutions:

1University Hospital Essen, Essen, NRW, 2University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany, 3Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 4University Medicine Essen, Essen, NRW, 5https://github.com/placebo-imaging-consortium/placebo-imaging-consortium.github.io, -, -

First Author:

Balint Kincses  
University Hospital Essen
Essen, NRW

Co-Author(s):

Tamás Spisák  
University Medicine Essen
Essen, Germany
Tor Wager, PhD  
Dartmouth College
Hanover, NH
Ulrike Bingel  
University Medicine Essen
Essen, NRW
Placebo Imaging Consortium  
https://github.com/placebo-imaging-consortium/placebo-imaging-consortium.github.io
-, -

Introduction:

Placebo analgesia (PA) is a widely investigated phenomenon, with a significant and considerable reduction of pain (Forsberg et al., 2017). A better understanding of its underlying neural mechanisms has promising implications for the exploitation of this effect in various clinical contexts. The neural correlates of PA during the pain delivery phase have previously been extensively investigated (Atlas & Wager, 2014; Zunhammer et al., 2018, 2021). However, brain activity preceding the pain stimulation, i.e. the anticipatory brain activity, has not thoroughly investigated. As anticipatory brain activity may reflect placebo-related expectations, its characterisation is an essential step towards the better understanding of mechanisms underlying PA. Here we investigated PA-related anticipatory brain activation changes with an unprecedented sample size in an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Methods:

IPD neuroimaging and behavioral data was collected on behalf of the Placebo Imaging Consortium, as previously described in (Zunhammer et al., 2018, 2021). The current analysis is based on an extended database, including 570 participants from 18 studies and focused on the differences in the anticipatory activity before pain stimulation with and without placebo-induction. Study plans were pre-registered at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/z4qu2). The preprocessing of IPD first-level anticipatory activation maps (ß or contrast images) consisted of re-slicing individual maps to MNI152 template, winsorizing voxel level data (outlier mitigation), and calculating meta-analytic summary scores with the voxel level generic inverse variance (GIV) approach, with studies as random effect. We investigated mean activation differences during the anticipation phase (placebo-control), as well as the correlation of these changes with behavioral placebo analgesia (pain rating differences). Permutation based (n permutation=5000) max statistics with probabilistic threshold free cluster enhancement (Spisák et al., 2019) was used to correct for the family-wise error rate with an alpha-value of 0.05 (two tailed). The analysis was done in MATLAB2021b and SPM12.

Results:

With the extended dataset, we observed behavioural PA effects similar to the previously reported estimates (Zunhammer et al., 2018) (Hedge's g: -0.63). In terms of mean placebo-related differences in anticipatory brain activity, we observed a statistically significant decrease in three clusters in the occipital lobe: MNI peak coordinates: x=-5.7, y=-87.9, z=-9.8; x=-4.2, y=-74.6, z=26.3; x=-18.2, y=-64.3, z=13.8, FWER corrected, p<0.05) and in the cerebellum (x= -21.9, y=-79.8, z=-23.8, FWER corrected, p<0.05). No significant FWER corrected activity increase was observed. Placebo-related decreases in anticipatory brain activity were negatively correlated with behavioral PA in the left putamen (Figure 1, MNI peak coordinates: x=-24.1, y=0.6, z=2.0, FWER corrected, p<0.05, two-tailed). Specifically, decreased anticipatory activity in the placebo condition led to higher behavioral PA (Figure 2).
Supporting Image: fig1.png
   ·Figure 1 Correlation between placebo related deactivation and behavioral placebo analgesia. Lower activity during placebo related to higher behavioral analgesia. Blue uncorrected (two-sided), p<0.01.
Supporting Image: fig2.png
   ·Figure 2 Correlation between behavior placebo analgesia (control-placebo) and brain activity difference in the anticipation phase in the putamen region. Circles represent individuals, colour codes dif
 

Conclusions:

Our previous meta-analytic results on the neural correlates of PA (Zunhammer et al., 2021) suggested that placebo is a multifaceted phenomenon, possibly driven by multiple complementary/parallel neural processes (e.g. in the presence and absence of conditioning). This heterogeneity may also apply to anticipatory activity and explain the lack of coherent increases across the investigated studies. The correlation analysis suggests that the involvement of the putamen is a common characteristic of different PA-related neural mechanisms during the anticipatory phase. It is therefore a promising target for further research aiming at the exploitation of PA in clinical contexts.

Higher Cognitive Functions:

Higher Cognitive Functions Other

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Activation (eg. BOLD task-fMRI) 2
Univariate Modeling

Perception, Attention and Motor Behavior:

Perception: Pain and Visceral 1

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Meta- Analysis
MRI
Pain
Other - placebo; placebo analgesia; pain anticipation; individual participant data

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

Atlas, L.Y. et al. (2014) ‘A meta-analysis of brain mechanisms of placebo analgesia: Consistent findings and unanswered questions’, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_3.
Forsberg, J.T. et al.(2017) ‘The placebo analgesic effect in healthy individuals and patients: A meta-analysis’, Psychosomatic Medicine. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000432.
Spisák, T. et al. (2019) ‘Probabilistic TFCE: A generalized combination of cluster size and voxel intensity to increase statistical power’, NeuroImage, 185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.078.
Zunhammer, M. et al. (2021) ‘Meta-analysis of neural systems underlying placebo analgesia from individual participant fMRI data’, Nature Communications, 12(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21179-3.
Zunhammer, M. et al. (2018) ‘Placebo Effects on the Neurologic Pain Signature: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data’, JAMA Neurology, 75(11). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2017.