Poster No:
1613
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Ardalan Aarabi1, Maedeh Khalilian1, Martine Roussel1, Olivier Godefroy1
Institutions:
1University of Picardy Jules Verne, Amiens, Picardie
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Focal structural damage to white matter tracts can lead to functional deficits in stroke patients. Traditional voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) is susceptible to issues such as lesion frequency and collinearity between neighboring voxels (Godefroy et al., 1998). The statistical power of VLSM is also hindered by patient heterogeneity in terms of lesion locations, volumes, and neurological symptoms, especially when lesions are situated in critical areas with a significant impact on structural connectivity between brain regions associated with functional deficits (Boes et al., 2015). In this study, we present a bootstrapped multivariate structural disconnection-symptom mapping (SVR-DSM) and decoding method based on support vector regression (DeMarco et al., 2018) to identify brain structures associated with motor deficits in stroke patients.
Methods:
Structural imaging data were acquired from 340 stroke patients (mean age 63.9 ± 10.5 years) with left/right motor deficits as part of the GRECogVASC study cohort [4] conducted at Amiens University Hospital. Clinical and neuropsychological examinations, along with MR imaging, were performed six months post-stroke. Among these patients, 64 displayed motor impairment in upper and lower limb items in the NIHSS (32 with left and 29 with right motor deficits, and 3 with both). Lesions for each patient were manually segmented on 3D T1 MRI data using MRIcron and normalized into the MNI152 template with SPM12. For disconnection-symptom mapping, a probabilistic structural disconnection map was created for each patient by utilizing streamlines passing through the patient's lesion. This was estimated through fiber tracking from diffusion-weighted imaging data obtained from over 400 healthy controls (mean age 62.87 ± 13.47 years) from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience repository (CamCAN, Stage 2) [5]. In these probabilistic maps, each voxel represented a disconnection probability (ranging from 0 to 1) based on the number of healthy subjects exhibiting a disconnection in that specific voxel [6]. For the left and right motor deficit, 100 bootstrapped bags of disconnection maps were then generated from all 340 patients to balance patients with (32 with left, 29 with right and 3 with both) motor deficits compared to 276 without motor deficits. Multivariate SVR regression analysis was then used to obtain a β-map for each bag using logistic regression and permutation testing (p<0.005, 1000 permutations) for left/right motor deficits. Statistical comparison of β-maps (SPM's second level, p<0.005, FWER corrected) using permutation testing produced a t-statistic map of voxels with significant associations with left/right motor deficits across all bags. Finally, a decoding model was constructed to predict right-left motor scores on a voxel-by-voxel basis using a searchlight strategy [7] and the leave-one-out cross-validation strategy across the bags.
Results:
The statistical maps obtained using SVR-DSM were more effective in identifying brain structures, including the corticospinal tract, shown to be associated with left/right motor deficits (Arnoux et al., 2018). In comparison with VLSM, for the right motor deficit, no lesioned voxels survived with p<0.005 in the left hemisphere after correction for multiple comparisons. SVR-DSM also demonstrated high sensitivities (0.87 and 0.79) in identifying patients with left and right motor deficits, respectively. The decoding model based on bootstrapped SVR maps achieved high accuracies (up to 100%) for disconnected voxels in identifying patients with motor deficits.
Conclusions:
Our results showed that for patient datasets with imbalanced data the bootstrapped bagging could significantly improve the performance of structural disconnection-deficit mapping compared to lesion-symptom mapping methods for identifying brain structures associated with motor deficits in stroke patients with relatively low false positive rates when dealing with unbalanced data
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Neurodegenerative/ Late Life (eg. Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s) 2
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Diffusion MRI Modeling and Analysis 1
Keywords:
Cerebrovascular Disease
Computational Neuroscience
Data analysis
Modeling
Motor
Multivariate
STRUCTURAL MRI
Tractography
White Matter
Other - stroke
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Godefroy, O. (1998). Brain-behaviour relationships. Some models and related statistical procedures for the study of brain-damaged patients. Brain, 121 ( Pt 8), 1545-1556.
Boes, A. D. (2015). Network localization of neurological symptoms from focal brain lesions. Brain, 138(Pt 10), 3061-3075.
DeMarco, A. T. (2018). A multivariate lesion symptom mapping toolbox and examination of lesion-volume biases and correction methods in lesion-symptom mapping. Hum Brain Mapp, 39(11), 4169-4182.
Barbay, M. (2018). Prevalence of Poststroke Neurocognitive Disorders Using National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network, VASCOG Criteria (Vascular Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders), and Optimized Criteria of Cognitive Deficit. Stroke, 49(5), 1141-1147.
Taylor, J. R (2017). The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample. Neuroimage, 144(Pt B), 262-269.
Thiebaut de Schotten, M. (2011). Atlasing location, asymmetry and inter-subject variability of white matter tracts in the human brain with MR diffusion tractography. Neuroimage, 54(1), 49-59.
Hebart, M. N. (2014). The Decoding Toolbox (TDT): a versatile software package for multivariate analyses of functional imaging data. Front Neuroinform, 8, 88.
Arnoux, A. (2018). Is VLSM a valid tool for determining the functional anatomy of the brain? Usefulness of additional Bayesian network analysis. Neuropsychologia, 121, 69-78.