Poster No:
1250
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Aikaterina Manoli1,2,3,4, Neville Magielse5,6,1, Felix Hoffstaedter7,6, Nilsu Saglam1, Lorenz Ahle1, Ceyda Yalcin1, Hidir Arslan1, Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann1, Jörn Diedrichsen8,9,10, Sofie Valk1,3,6
Institutions:
1Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 2International Max Planck Research School on Cognitive Neuroimaging, Leipzig, Germany, 3Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behavior (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 4Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany, 5INM-7, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, NRW, 6Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, 7Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, NRW, 8The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 9Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 10Department of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
First Author:
Aikaterina Manoli
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences|International Max Planck Research School on Cognitive Neuroimaging|Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behavior (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich|Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University
Leipzig, Germany|Leipzig, Germany|Jülich, Germany|Leipzig, Germany
Co-Author(s):
Neville Magielse
INM-7, Research Center Jülich|Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf|Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Jülich, NRW|Düsseldorf, Germany|Leipzig, Germany
Felix Hoffstaedter
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich|Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Jülich, NRW|Düsseldorf, Germany
Nilsu Saglam
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Leipzig, Germany
Lorenz Ahle
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Leipzig, Germany
Ceyda Yalcin
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Leipzig, Germany
Hidir Arslan
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Leipzig, Germany
Jörn Diedrichsen
The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario|Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario|Department of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada|London, Ontario, Canada|London, Ontario, Canada
Sofie Valk
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences|Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behavior (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich|Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Leipzig, Germany|Jülich, Germany|Düsseldorf, Germany
Introduction:
Apart from its role in motor processing, the cerebellum is involved in a wide range of cognitive functions, extending its relevance for clinical conditions. Accumulating evidence from paediatric populations suggests that early-life cerebellar abnormalities are linked to neurocognitive deficits in autism and schizophrenia (Olson et al., 2023). Despite these periods being closely linked to the development of neuropsychiatric disorders, a normative framework of cerebellar development is currently lacking. Here, we constructed normative models of cerebellar volumetric growth from infancy to adulthood, by focusing on both anatomical and functional cerebellar parcellations.
Methods:
We leveraged open structural (T1-weighted) MRI data from the Baby Connectome Project (BCP; Howell et al., 2019) and the Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Development (HCP-D; Somerville et al., 2018) (Ntotal=993; age range: 0.5-22 years). Infant scans (< 2 years) were preprocessed with iBEAT (Dai et al., 2013), a toolbox optimized for infant brain processing and extraction. Child and adolescent scans (> 2 years) were processed with the standard HCP minimal preprocessing pipelines (Glasser et al., 2013). We obtained native-space anatomical volumes using ACAPULCO (Han et al., 2020), a convolutional neural network-based algorithm that segments the cerebellum into 28 lobules. For functional models, we used an atlas of 10 cerebellar regions spanning cognitive, affective and motor domains (King et al., 2019). We extracted functional parcel volumes by resampling the MNI-space atlas to each subject's native space with trilinear interpolation. Manual correction of anatomical and functional parcel masks was employed to account for over- or under-inclusion of cerebellar boundaries. We constructed anatomical and functional growth models using hierarchical Bayesian regression (HBR), which allowed us to control for sex and scanner site variability by specifying them as batch effects (Gaiser et al., 2023). We generated linear and 3rd-order b-spline models of cerebellar growth across age for each parcel, after splitting the dataset into a training (80%) and test set (20%). Inference was performed with Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (4 chains with 2000 samples). Finally, linear and b-spline model performance was compared via leave-one-out cross-validation.
Results:
We found divergent effects of age on cerebellar volumes within anatomical (Fig. 1A) and functional parcels (Fig. 1B). Anterior anatomical parcels (lobules I–VI) demonstrated larger age-related effects (i.e., steeper growth trajectories) compared to posterior parcels (lobules VII–IX). Contrarily, all functional parcels demonstrated consistent volumetric increases across age. Lastly, models stratified by sex revealed steeper growth trajectories for males compared to females, with females also demonstrating patterns of slight volumetric decrease across development in anatomical parcels.
Conclusions:
We found differences in normative trajectories between anatomical and functional cerebellar parcellations. Functional regions, involved in distinct cognitive processes, demonstrated consistent volumetric growth, which could reflect improvement in cognitive tasks across age. By contrast, anatomical regions showed a posterior-anterior gradient, in which anterior volumes increased more steeply than posterior volumes. This can be interpreted in light of the lack of convergence between functional and anatomical boundaries in the cerebellum (King et al., 2019). Anterior anatomical regions, uniformly involved in motor functions, demonstrate consistent growth across development. Conversely, the size of posterior anatomical regions encompasses a mosaic of functional subregions, which span several anatomical boundaries. This highlights a greater relevance of functional maps of the cerebellum for early-life diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders, based on deviations from normative trajectories related to specific cognitive functions.
Lifespan Development:
Early life, Adolescence, Aging 1
Normal Brain Development: Fetus to Adolescence 2
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Bayesian Modeling
Segmentation and Parcellation
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Anatomy and Functional Systems
Keywords:
Cerebellum
Cognition
Development
Modeling
MRI
NORMAL HUMAN
Open Data
PEDIATRIC
Segmentation
STRUCTURAL MRI
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Dai, Y. (2012). ‘iBEAT: A Toolbox for Infant Brain Magnetic Resonance Image Processing’, Neuroinformatics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 211–225.
Diedrichsen, J. (2009). ‘A Probabilistic MR Atlas of the Human Cerebellum’, NeuroImage, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 39–46.
Gaiser, C. (2023). ‘Large Data on the Small Brain: Population-Wide Cerebellar Growth Models of Children and Adolescents’, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).
Glasser, M. F. (2013). ‘The Minimal Preprocessing Pipelines for the Human Connectome Project’, NeuroImage, vol. 80, pp. 105–124.
Han, S. (2020). ‘Automatic Cerebellum Anatomical Parcellation Using U-Net with Locally Constrained Optimization’, NeuroImage, vol. 218, pp. 116819.
Howell, B. (2019). ‘The UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project (BCP): An Overview of the Study Design and Protocol Development’, NeuroImage, vol. 185, pp. 891–905.
King, M. (2019). ‘Functional Boundaries in the Human Cerebellum Revealed by a Multi-Domain Task Battery’, Nature Neuroscience, vol. 22, no 8, pp. 1371–1378.
Olson, I. R. (2023). ‘Little Brain, Little Minds: The Big Role of the Cerebellum in Social Development’, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 60, pp. 101238.
Somerville, L. H. (2018). ‘The Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Development: A Large-Scale Study of Brain Connectivity Development in 5–21 Year Olds’, NeuroImage, vol. 183, pp. 456–468.