Mapping evolutionary cortical expansion with anatomical MSM

Poster No:

1838 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Burke Rosen1, Chad Donahue1, Timothy Coalson1, John Harwell1, Renato Besenczi2, Emma Robinson2, Takuya Hayashi3, David van Essen1, Matthew Glasser1

Institutions:

1Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 2King's College London, London, England, 3RIKEN Center for Biocystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo

First Author:

Burke Rosen  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO

Co-Author(s):

Chad Donahue  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO
Timothy Coalson  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO
John Harwell  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO
Renato Besenczi  
King's College London
London, England
Emma Robinson, Dr  
King's College London
London, England
Takuya Hayashi  
RIKEN Center for Biocystems Dynamics Research
Kobe, Hyogo
David van Essen  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO
Matthew Glasser, Dr.  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO

Introduction:

The surface area of human cortex is ~3-fold greater than that of chimpanzee and >9 times greater than that of the macaque ​​[1]​​. This enlargement is non-uniform across the cortex. For example, primary visual cortex (V1) is only ~2-fold greater in human vs macaque ​​[2]​​. However, previously published maps ​[3–5]​​ of macaque vs human expansion are in poor agreement with one another (Fig. 1A). This may reflect differing registration constraints and algorithms, but one commonality among them is that none have adequately compensated for large areal distortions that arise when projecting anatomical surfaces to the sphere (Fig. 1B). These distortions are particularly deleterious in interspecies registration because the relationship between areal boundaries and cortical folds is very different between ​species ​[1,2]​. To address this issue, we have applied the anatomical Multimodal Surface Matching ​[6]​ (aMSM) algorithm, which was originally designed to enable accurate longitudinal registration of human cortices.
Supporting Image: Fig1.png
 

Methods:

Individuals' cortical surfaces and myelin maps were reconstructed ​[7]​ from high-resolution T1 and T2 weighted MR Images for human (n=1071), chimpanzee (n=19), and macaque (n=32) ​[1,8]​. For each species, a group template surface was created with Connectome Workbench ​[1,7,8]​. Interspecies registration between the template surfaces was performed in two stages. The chimpanzee intermediate used for the first stage served to reduce the necessary areal distortion of each species pair registration. Each species pair registration was performed in both directions and results averaged. To compensate for the loss of surface area introduced by inter-subject averaging of human surface meshes with highly variable folding (Fig. 1C), evolutionary expansion was estimated by resampling each human surface to the macaque mesh and averaging vertex areas across subjects. All registrations were performed using 15 putatively homologous regions (PHRs), or landmarks, as registration features. PHRs were delineated based on previous studies and informed by myelin and other features (Fig. 1D). Parameters were tuned to achieve a balance of feature matching while minimizing areal distortions. Tuning was performed separately for spherical MSM ​[9]​ and aMSM to ensure fair comparison.

Results:

We found that interspecies expansion estimated with anatomical MSM resulted in less folding bias than that estimated by spherical MSM (Fig 2A). The application of aMSM results in smaller areal changes in human posterior middle temporal gyrus, an area disproportionately distorted by spherical projection and differences in expansion between the algorithms. The pattern of expansion in chimpanzee vs macaque is quite different from human vs chimpanzee (Fig. 2B). In the former as compared with the latter, expansion is more pronounced in somatomotor areas and more modest in insula. Resampling human individuals then averaging the resulting expansion maps yields the mean evolutionary expansion ratio without a surface averaging loss effect caused by human interindividual folding variability (Fig. 2C). This procedure resulted in smoother expansion maps and approximately 2 times greater absolute expansion when compared to the group average surface used for regularization during aMSM.
Supporting Image: Fig2.png
 

Conclusions:

Accurate registration of macaque and human cortices is critical for understanding primate brain evolution and for augmenting the clinical and scientific interpretability of animal models. We conclude that using anatomical MSM for interspecies registration and avoiding human surface mesh averaging results in material improvements over prior efforts. Our maps of human vs chimpanzee expansion are consistent with previous findings that a comparatively small somatomotor cortex may be a derived trait in human ​[10]​. Future refinements will incorporate additional features, including myelin maps and fMRI into the registrations.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Image Registration and Computational Anatomy 1

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

Cortical Anatomy and Brain Mapping 2
Cortical Cyto- and Myeloarchitecture
Neuroanatomy Other

Keywords:

Cortex
Other - evolution;human;macaque;chimpanzee;MSM;registration;surface;HCP;MRI

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Hayashi T, Hou Y, Glasser MF, Autio JA, Knoblauch K, Inoue-Murayama M, Coalson T, Yacoub E, Smith S, Kennedy H, et al. The nonhuman primate neuroimaging and neuroanatomy project. NeuroImage. 2021;229:117726.
2. Donahue CJ, Glasser MF, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, Van Essen DC. Quantitative assessment of prefrontal cortex in humans relative to nonhuman primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018;115(22):E5183–E5192.
3. Van Essen DC, Dierker DL. Surface-based and probabilistic atlases of primate cerebral cortex. Neuron. 2007;56(2):209–225.
4. Xu T, Nenning KH, Schwartz E, Hong SJ, Vogelstein JT, Goulas A, Fair DA, Schroeder CE, Margulies DS, Smallwood J, et al. Cross-species functional alignment reveals evolutionary hierarchy within the connectome. NeuroImage. 2020;223.
5. Eichert N, Robinson EC, Bryant KL, Jbabdi S, Jenkinson M, Li L, Krug K, Watkins KE, Mars RB. Cross-species cortical alignment identifies different types of anatomical reorganization in the primate temporal lobe. Elife. 2020;9:e53232.
6. Garcia KE, Robinson EC, Alexopoulos D, Dierker DL, Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Ortinau CM, Rueckert D, Taber LA, Van Essen DC, et al. Dynamic patterns of cortical expansion during folding of the preterm human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(12):3156–3161.
7. Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TEJ, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview. NeuroImage. 2013;80:62–79.
8. Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, Coalson TS, Fischl B, Andersson JL, Xu J, Jbabdi S, Webster M, Polimeni JR. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013;80:105–124.
9. Robinson EC, Garcia K, Glasser MF, Chen Z, Coalson TS, Makropoulos A, Bozek J, Wright R, Schuh A, Webster M, et al. Multimodal surface matching with higher-order smoothness constraints. NeuroImage.
10. Hopkins WD, Meguerditchian A, Coulon O, Bogart S, Mangin JF, Sherwood CC, Grabowski MW, Bennett AJ, Pierre PJ, Fears S, et al. Evolution of the central sulcus morphology in primates. Brain, Behavior and Evolution. 2014;84(1):19–30.