Poster No:
2117
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Jiwandeep Kohli1, Anny Reyes1, Austin Hopper1, Alena Stasenko1, Natalia Menendez1, Divya Prabhakaran1, Roshan Karunamuni1, Jona Hattangadi-Gluth1, Carrie McDonald1
Institutions:
1University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Anny Reyes
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, CA
Introduction:
Patients with primary brain tumors exhibit substantial variability in neurocognitive profiles, likely related to multifactorial etiologies and different neuroanatomical locations. Cognitive phenotyping offers a patient-centered approach toward characterizing patterns of impairment and has shown utility for determining risk for disease progression in neurological disorders (Hancock et al., 2023; Hermann et al., 2007). Investigating the neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive phenotypes in patients with brain tumors may lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying different patterns of cognitive impairment while also elucidating specific risk factors for cognitive decline.
Methods:
Patients with primary brain tumors were recruited for a prospective, observational study examining the effects of fractionated, partial brain radiotherapy on cognition between 2014 and 2021. Neurocognitive and structural MRI data were available for 79 participants prior to radiation treatment. Patients were cognitively phenotyped using latent profile analysis in a prior study, which revealed three groups: those with generalized impairments (17.7%), those with isolated verbal memory impairments (12.7%), and those with minimal impairments (69.6%). MRI scans were acquired on a 3.0T 750 GE scanner. Anatomical images were acquired using a T1-weighted inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo sequence and diffusion data were acquired with a single-shot pulsed-field gradient spin EPI sequence with b = 0, 500, 1500, and 4000 s/mm2, with 1, 6, 6, and 15 unique gradient directions for each b-value respectively. Anatomical scans were processed using FreeSurfer version 5.3.0. Diffusion tensors were calculated using mono-exponential fitting from b=0, 500, and 1500 s/mm2 to extract estimates of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). DTI metrics were calculated from the co-registered DTI maps by sampling up to 5 mm below the white matter surface normal at each vertex and then averaging within each ROI volume. Tumor, necrotic tissue, and regions of edema were manually censored for each patient and excluded from final ROIs prior to analysis. Cognitive phenotypes were compared using ANCOVAs for CT, FA, and MD in each ROI while controlling for age, with follow up pairwise comparisons. Pearson correlations with neurocognitive test performance were examined in regions exhibiting significant differences between groups on structural metrics.
Results:
Compared to the minimal impairment group, the verbal memory impairment group showed significantly increased CT in the left temporal pole (p = 0.032) and right parahippocampal gyrus (p = 0.022), along with reduced MD bilaterally in the parahippocampal gyri (left p = 0.008; right p = 0.078). Greater MD in the left parahippocampal gryus was also significantly associated with poorer HVLT Learning (r = 0.784; p < 0.001) and Delayed Recall (r = 0.528; p < 0.01) scores. The generalized impairment group showed decreased CT in the left cuneus (p = 0.039) left frontal pole (p = 0.049), right pars orbitalis (p = 0.033) and right superior parietal region (p = 0.049). Neither CT nor FA was associated with cognitive performances within the phenotypes.
Conclusions:
Cognitive phenotypes in patients with primary brain tumors showed unique patterns of brain pathology, suggesting different underlying mechanisms of impairment profiles. These results demonstrate the utility of examining neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive phenotypes for identifying areas of vulnerability that may inform treatment decisions for individual patients based on patterns of neurocognitive performance, with significant brain-cognition correlations supporting the biological relevance of this approach. Examining how phenotypes evolve over the course of treatment could be additionally helpful for understanding the effects of different intervention approaches on cognition, and for identifying patients at risk for treatment-related decline.
Learning and Memory:
Learning and Memory Other
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Diffusion MRI Modeling and Analysis
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Cortical Anatomy and Brain Mapping 1
White Matter Anatomy, Fiber Pathways and Connectivity 2
Keywords:
Memory
Neoplastic Disease
STRUCTURAL MRI
WHITE MATTER IMAGING - DTI, HARDI, DSI, ETC
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Dale, A. M. (1999), Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage, 9(2), 179–194.
Fischl, B. (1999), Cortical surface-based analysis: II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage, 9(2), 195–207.
Hancock, L. M. (2023), A proposed new taxonomy of cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis: The International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in MS (IC-CoDiMS). Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 29(4–5), 615–627.
Hermann, B. (2007), Cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(1), 12–20.