Poster No:
963
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Khazar Ahmadi1, David Stawarczyk1, Viktor Pfaffenrot2, Carlos Gomes1, Sriranga Kashyap3, Zita Patai1, David Norris4, Nikolai Axmacher5
Institutions:
1Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, North Rhine Westfalen, Germany, 2Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, North Rhine Westfalen, Germany, 3Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 4Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 5Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, North Rhine Westfalen, , Germany
First Author:
Khazar Ahmadi
Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum
Bochum, North Rhine Westfalen, Germany
Co-Author(s):
David Stawarczyk
Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum
Bochum, North Rhine Westfalen, Germany
Viktor Pfaffenrot
Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen
Essen, North Rhine Westfalen, Germany
Carlos Gomes
Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum
Bochum, North Rhine Westfalen, Germany
Sriranga Kashyap
Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Zita Patai
Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum
Bochum, North Rhine Westfalen, Germany
David Norris
Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Nikolai Axmacher
Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum
Bochum, North Rhine Westfalen, , Germany
Introduction:
The Hippocampus (HP) is a critical region for core cognitive functions including memory and spatial navigation. Although these functions have been extensively studied at macroscale (1), the underlying circuit-level mechanisms are yet to be determined. Harnessing the current advancements in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at submillimeter scale, we aimed to investigate the laminar organization of HP subfields during spatial navigation and their associations with distinct navigation strategies.
Methods:
39 healthy volunteers underwent a 2-session fMRI study using a 7T MAGNETOM-Terra scanner. During the first day, an anatomical image was acquired with 3D-MP2RAGE (2) sequence (isotropic spatial resolution of 0.75 mm3). This was followed by the acquisition of two fMRI runs using a 3D GRE-EPI sequence (3) with BOLD contrast (isotropic voxel size of 0.8 mm3, phase-encoding direction = A-P, TR = 2500 ms). On day 2, six additional fMRI runs were obtained. During each run, the participants navigated to six hidden objects randomly distributed in a virtual arena and completed 18 trials per run, each consisting of a retrieval and a subsequent re-encoding phase (see Fig.1A). Following preprocessing of the fMRI data and subsequent alignment with the anatomical images, HP was segmented into subfields including cornu ammonis (CA 1-4), stratum radiatum/lacunosum-moleculare (SRLM) and dentate gyrus (see ref.4). Furthermore, three folded surfaces were generated using an equivolume model, representing inner/outer sections and mid-thickness of the HP gray matter (Fig.1B). These surfaces were then transformed into the space of the corresponding anatomical image and equidistantly sampled into 30 depth bins using an in-house MATLAB script. This allowed for extraction of the BOLD signal across the bins during the navigation phase, that were later grouped into the inner, middle and outer depths. We further assessed trial-specific performance, i.e., drop error (see Fig.1A). Afterwards, different navigation strategies were quantified with two metrics: straightness index (SI), and median deviation to the boundary (MDB; see Fig.2A). Subsequently, we performed linear mixed-effect models to assess the association of subregional laminar profiles with drop error and navigation strategies. The extraction of laminar profiles in subfields is still ongoing (N = 13 until now).

Results:
Drop error decreased across runs and trials, indicating a gradual improvement of the participants' behavioral performance (see Fig.2B). During the navigation phase, an inverse U-shaped pattern of the BOLD signal was observed throughout the layers of CA1 and the adjacent segment of SRLM whereas the laminar profile of CA3 demonstrated a largely monotonous decrease from inner to outer depths (Fig.2C). Further, higher drop error was associated with increased BOLD activity in inner, middle and outer depths of CA1, CA3 (β = 3.02, 4.46, p = 0.0002, 0 | β = 2.53, 4.96 p = 0.003, 0 | β = 1.77, 5.27, p = 0.04, < 0.0001, respectively) and the neighboring SRLM regions (β = 2.34, p = 0.002 SRLM-CA1; β = 3.75, p = 0.0001 SRLM-CA3). While SI was positively correlated with laminar activity only in the middle and outer layers of CA1 (β = 2.43, 3.59 p = 0.005, 0.0001, respectively), lower SI was associated with elevated BOLD signal across all three layers of CA3 (inner: β = -3.74, p = 0.0003, middle: β = -4.26, p = 0.0001, outer: β = -4.45, p = < 0.0001) and SRLM-CA3 (β = -2.99, p = 0.001). By contrast, an increase in MDB was accompanied by a higher BOLD signal specifically in CA3 (inner: β = 2.59, p = 0.01, middle: β = 2.67, p = 0.01, outer: β = 2.76, p = 0.007) and SRLM-CA3 (β = 2.66, p = 0.004).

Conclusions:
Our preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of laminar-resolution recordings in human HP. They suggest that distinct navigation strategies are differentially related to subregion-specific laminar profiles, and that higher BOLD responses in CA1 and CA3 are negatively related to navigation performance.
Higher Cognitive Functions:
Higher Cognitive Functions Other 1
Learning and Memory:
Learning and Memory Other
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Activation (eg. BOLD task-fMRI) 2
Keywords:
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Memory
NORMAL HUMAN
Statistical Methods
Other - navigation; hippocampus; ultra-high field
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
1. Julian, J. B. (2021). Remapping and realignment in the human hippocampal formation predict context-dependent spatial behavior. Nature neuroscience, 24(6), 863-872.
2. Marques, J. P. (2010). MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1271-1281.
3. Stirnberg, R. (2021). Segmented K‐space blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for high spatiotemporal resolution EPI. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 85(3), 1540-1551.
4. DeKraker, J. (2022). Automated hippocampal unfolding for morphometry and subfield segmentation with HippUnfold. Elife, 11, e77945.