Structural Connectivity in Different Types of Reward Among Youth: A combined fMRI and DTI study

Poster No:

2362 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Siti Mariam Roslan1, Asma Hayati Ahmad2, Aini Ismafairus Abd Hamid2

Institutions:

1Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, 2Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia

First Author:

Siti Mariam Roslan  
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Kubang Kerian, Kelantan

Co-Author(s):

Asma Hayati Ahmad  
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
Aini Ismafairus Abd Hamid  
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Kubang Kerian, Malaysia

Introduction:

Neuroimaging studies have identified brain areas involved in reward processing. However, the connectivity of different types of reward remains unclear. This study aims to determine the structural connectivity in different types of reward cues among young adults.

Methods:

Twenty right-handed students (11 males) with the mean age of 24±1 from School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia participated in this study. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan, while performing the 2-back tasks. Different cues (cash and filial) were displayed during the tasks. The participants remained inside the MRI scanner for diffusion MRI scan. Participants were divided into cash and filial groups based on their highest score during the 2-back tasks. Probabilistic tractography was performed to calculate the number of streamlines from the seed to targets. The seed was selected based on region-of-interests (ROI) extracted from random effects analysis (RFX) whereas the targets were selected based on previous literatures. The seed region was putamen, whereas ten targets were selected which included anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anterior insula, and posterior insula.

Results:

The highest connection probability in filial group was observed between the right putamen to the right amygdala. Whereas in cash group, the highest connectivity was between the right putamen to the right anterior insula.

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest that differential structural connectivity exist in processing different rewards.

Emotion, Motivation and Social Neuroscience:

Reward and Punishment

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

White Matter Anatomy, Fiber Pathways and Connectivity 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

BOLD fMRI
Diffusion MRI 1

Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission :

Neurophysiology of Imaging Signals

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
STRUCTURAL MRI
WHITE MATTER IMAGING - DTI, HARDI, DSI, ETC
Other - Reward, Youth

1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Supporting Image: Screenshot2023-12-01at125010PM.png
 

Provide references using author date format

Banich, M.T. and Floresco, S. (2019) ‘Reward systems, cognition, and emotion: Introduction to the special issue’, Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience. Springer New York LLC, pp. 409–414. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00725-z.
Bartra, O., McGuire, J.T. and Kable, J.W. (2013) ‘The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value’, NeuroImage, 76, pp. 412–427. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.063.
Berry, A.S., Jagust, W.J. and Hsu, M. (2019) ‘Age-related variability in decision-making: Insights from neurochemistry’, Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(3), pp. 415–434. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-00678-9.
Bradley, K.A.L. et al. (2017) ‘Neural correlates of RDoC reward constructs in adolescents with diverse psychiatric symptoms: A Reward Flanker Task pilot study’, Journal of Affective Disorders, 216, pp. 36–45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.042.
Camara, E. et al. (2009) ‘Reward networks in the brain as captured by connectivity measures’, 3(3), pp. 350–362.
Cao, Z. et al. (2019) ‘Mapping adolescent reward anticipation, receipt, and prediction error during the monetary incentive delay task’, Human Brain Mapping, 40(1), pp. 262–283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24370.
Chan, Y., Hsu, W. and Chou, T. (2018) ‘Dissociation between the processing of humorous and monetary rewards in the “ motivation ” and “ hedonic ” brains’, (May), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33623-4.
Chan, Y.C., Wang, C.Y. and Chou, T.L. (2023) ‘Money or funny: Effective connectivity during service recovery with a DCM-PEB approach’, Biological Psychology, 176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108464.
Chaplin, T.M., Mauro, K.L. and Niehaus, C.E. (2022) ‘Effects of Parenting Environment on Child and Adolescent Social-Emotional Brain Function’, Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 54, pp. 341–372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2021_276.
Chen, Z. et al. (2016) ‘Maturation along white matter tracts in human brain using a diffusion tensor surface model tract-specific analysis’, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 10(FEB), pp. 1–18.
Gibson, G. (2017) ‘Cocaine and the Dopamine Hypothesis of Addiction FYS100C : Gotta Have It : Exploring the Science of Addiction’, Chemistry: Student Scholarship & Creative Works, 7,