Poster No:
2031
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Yanmei Tie1, Laura Rigolo2, Colin Galvin2, Alexandra Golby3, Einat Liebenthal4
Institutions:
1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA
First Author:
Yanmei Tie
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Task-based functional MRI (task fMRI) is conventionally used for presurgical language mapping[1]. However, neurosurgical patients may have difficulty performing the language tasks satisfactorily, particularly if they have pre-existing language or other cognitive deficits[2], which could in turn affect the quality of task fMRI language mapping. To tackle this problem, we adopted naturalistic fMRI using movie clips as stimuli (movie fMRI), based on the hypothesis that movies depicting real-life conversation scenes can more completely engage the language networks supporting every-day language communication. We previously demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of movie fMRI for mapping language areas in individual healthy subjects[3], and for presurgical language mapping in individual brain tumor patients[4]. The present work compares different analytic approaches to movie fMRI for language mapping, in relation to task fMRI.
Methods:
We reanalyzed data from our initial study[3] in 22 right-handed healthy native English speakers (11 females, mean age=26.3 yrs, range: 19-39 yrs). All subjects underwent movie fMRI with a 7-min excerpt from the film "The Parent Trap", which included 7 conversation segments interleaved with 6 non-speech scenes. Subjects also underwent language task fMRI consisting of 7 blocks of antonym generation and 7 blocks of letter case categorization, interleaved with fixation intervals.
Two main analytical approaches were investigated for movie fMRI: (1) a hypothesis-driven general linear model (GLM) with (a) a regressor of weighted word count derived from the movie subtitles; (b) a regressor of conversation segments derived based on the weighted word count convolved with a hemodynamic response function. (2) a Data-driven group independent component analysis (ICA), with 34 components extracted using the Infomax algorithm, of which one language component was identified based on temporal correlation with the conversation regressor. In addition, an inter-subject correlation (ISC) analysis was performed[5].
Results:
Figure 1a-d shows the movie group results. For GLM with the weighted word count as a linear regressor, one activation cluster was revealed in the left superior temporal sulcus (Fig. 1a), consistent with an area specialized for sub-lexical phonemic processing[6]. For GLM with the conversation regressor, positive activation was seen in multiple putative language areas in the left inferior frontal and bilateral temporoparietal cortex, and there was also negative activation (i.e., greater in non-conversation segments) in visual areas (Fig. 1b). The ICA derived language map (Fig. 1c) was similar to the conversation GLM map (Fig. 1b) but showed no activation in visual areas (Fig. 2b). The ISC map revealed extensive areas of synchronized activation across subjects (Fig. 1d). Within the language network, the strongest cross-subject synchronization was seen in the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (Fig. 2a). The task fMRI map showed extensive activation in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia and limited activation in left posterior middle and inferior temporal cortex (Fig. 1e). Compared to task fMRI, movie fMRI revealed more superior and middle temporal activation and less insulae activation (Fig. 2c-d).


Conclusions:
The results demonstrate the efficacy of movie fMRI language mapping. First, different regressors can be used in GLM analyses of movie fMRI to map different aspects of language processing, as exemplified here for phonemic perception (Fig. 1a). Second, data-driven analysis of the movie fMRI data provided more comprehensive mapping of temporal language regions than task fMRI. Third, the data-driven analysis of movie fMRI returned a specific language component, whereas the GLM-derived language map included residual visual activation. Finally, ISC analysis revealed varying levels of cross-subject synchrony during movie watching within the language network, which we will further investigate in future work.
Language:
Language Comprehension and Semantics 2
Speech Perception
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Activation (eg. BOLD task-fMRI)
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling
Task-Independent and Resting-State Analysis 1
Keywords:
Aphasia
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Language
Multivariate
Neurological
Other - Naturalistic fMRI
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
[1] Unadkat P, Fumagalli L, Rigolo L, Vangel MG, Young GS, Huang R, et al. Functional MRI Task Comparison for Language Mapping in Neurosurgical Patients. Journal of Neuroimaging : Official Journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging 2019;00:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12597.
[2] Silva MA, See AP, Essayed WI, Golby AJ, Tie Y. Challenges and techniques for presurgical brain mapping with functional MRI. NeuroImage: Clinical 2018;17:794–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.008.
[3] Tie Y, Rigolo L, Ozdemir Ovalioglu A, Olubiyi O, Doolin KL, Mukundan S, et al. A New Paradigm for Individual Subject Language Mapping: Movie-Watching fMRI. Journal of Neuroimaging 2015;25:710–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12251.
[4] Yao S, Rigolo L, Yang F, Vangel MG, Wang H, Golby AJ, et al. Movie-watching fMRI for presurgical language mapping in patients with brain tumour. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022;93:220–1. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325738.
[5] Kauppi JP, Pajula J, Tohka J. A versatile software package for inter-subject correlation based analyses of fMRI. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2014;8:2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00002.
[6] Liebenthal E, Binder JR, Spitzer SM, Possing ET, Medler DA. Neural substrates of phonemic perception. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:1621–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi040.