Exploring moment-to-moment brain signal variability before and after pregnancy: preliminary results

Poster No:

2030 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Sara Halmans1, Damiaan Denys1, Kristoffer Månsson2, Elseline Hoekzema1

Institutions:

1Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

First Author:

Sara Halmans  
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Co-Author(s):

Damiaan Denys  
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Kristoffer Månsson  
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, Sweden
Elseline Hoekzema  
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Introduction:

Pregnancy represents an important endocrine event and life transition in women that is associated with pronounced structural and functional changes in the brain.1-2 Increased prevalence of psychiatric symptoms during the perinatal period emphasize the importance of understanding the neural underpinnings of this life transition.3 Despite the focus of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research on the interpretation of mean blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals, several studies have shown that the within-individual variability of brain responses represents a key component of neural processes.4-6 Research indicates that fMRI signal variability fluctuates over the lifespan, and neural variability has also been linked to both psychiatric symptoms and cognitive performance.6-8 In this study, we aim to examine if becoming a mother is associated with alterations in moment-to-moment variability in resting-state neural response. Here, our objective was to compare the nulliparous control group and women that want to become pregnant for the first time at baseline.

Methods:

Herein, 110 women took part in a prospective cohort study, involving longitudinal data of first- (n=40) and second-time mothers (n=30), who were scanned 1) before conception, 2) at an early stage and 3) at a later postpartum stage (see Figure 1). A nulliparous control group (n=40) was scanned twice at a similar time interval as the first-time mothers (i.e., ~ 12 months). Resting-state fMRI was performed at all sessions. fMRI preprocessing included a manually denoising procedure.9 Briefly, independent component analysis (ICA), was used to separated brain signals into components, and manual decisions were made whether each component were neural activity or not (e.g., movement, noise). The noise components were subsequently regressed out of the signal. The standard deviation of the BOLD signal (SDBOLD) was calculated over the entire time series of a single scan per voxel (see Figure 2), allowing us to investigate whole-brain voxel-wise signal variability. To delve into possible dynamic aspects within the resting-state, the five-minute resting-state scan was also segmented into five one-minute intervals for inter-group comparisons. Case-control comparisons on resting-state SDBOLD data were performed using independent t-tests in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12; implemented in Matlab R2022a). Alpha was set at p < 0.001 (whole-brain uncorrected).
Supporting Image: Figure1_OHBM_abstract_SaraHalmans.png
Supporting Image: Figure2_OHBM_abstract_SaraHalmans.png
 

Results:

By use of SDBOLD resting-state data at the PRE time point, we compared the nulliparous control group (CTRL) and the group of women wanting to become pregnant (PREG) using two contrasts: 1) CTRL > PREG, 2) PREG < CTRL. No significant clusters are reported. Comparisons of the shorter one-minute segments of the resting-state data also showed no significance. Further analyses of the later time points (i.e., postpartum), to investigate longitudinal changes, in both resting-state and task-based fMRI data are still pending.

Conclusions:

The absence of significant differences in both directions indicates that the control group and the pregnancy group do not differ in neural variability during resting-state fMRI. This was expected, given that the two groups at the PRE time point differ only in the current desire to have a child in the pregnancy group. It is known that becoming a mother renders strong changes in neural grey matter structure and neural activity.2 Therefore, future analyses of this longitudinal dataset may further elucidate whether pregnancy is associated with changes in neural variability. Additionally, previous research suggests that task-based variability may outperform resting-state variability.6 Including task-based data may therefore also provide insights into whether differences between task-based and resting-state variability are also evident in the context of pregnancy.

Lifespan Development:

Lifespan Development Other 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Activation (eg. BOLD task-fMRI)
Motion Correction and Preprocessing
Task-Independent and Resting-State Analysis 1

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

BOLD fMRI

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Other - Pregnancy; Signal variability; resting-state

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Hoekzema, E., van Steenbergen, H., Straathof, M., Beekmans, A., Freund, I. M., Pouwels, P. J. W., & Crone, E. A. (2022). Mapping the effects of pregnancy on resting state brain activity, white matter microstructure, neural metabolite concentrations and grey matter architecture. Nature Communications, 13(1), 6931. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33884-8
2. Hoekzema, E., Barba-Müller, E., Pozzobon, C., Picado, M., Lucco, F., García-García, D., Soliva, J. C., Tobeña, A., Desco, M., Crone, E. A., Ballesteros, A., Carmona, S., & Vilarroya, O. (2017). Pregnancy leads to long-lasting changes in human brain structure. Nature Neuroscience, 20(2), Article 2. doi: 10.1038/nn.4458
3. Dennis, C. L., Falah-Hassani, K., & Shiri, R. (2017). Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. The British journal of psychiatry: the journal of mental science, 210(5), 315–323. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179
4. Garrett, D. D., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., MacDonald, S. W. S., Lindenberger, U., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2013). Moment-to-moment brain signal variability: A next frontier in human brain mapping? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(4), 610–624. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.015
5. Garrett, D. D., Kovacevic, N., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2010). Blood oxygen level-dependent signal variability is more than just noise. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30(14), 4914–4921. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5166-09.2010
6. Månsson, K. N. T., Waschke, L., Manzouri, A., Furmark, T., Fischer, H., & Garrett, D. D. (2022). Moment-to-Moment Brain Signal Variability Reliably Predicts Psychiatric Treatment Outcome. Biological Psychiatry, 91(7), 658–666. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.09.026
7. McIntosh, A. R., Kovacevic, N., & Itier, R. J. (2008). Increased brain signal variability accompanies lower behavioral variability in development. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(7), e1000106.
8. Armbruster-Genç, D. J. N., Ueltzhöffer, K., & Fiebach, C. J. (2016). Brain Signal Variability Differentially Affects Cognitive Flexibility and Cognitive Stability. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(14), 3978–3987.
9. Griffanti, L., Douaud, G., Bijsterbosch, J., Evangelisti, S., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Glasser, M. F., Duff, E. P., Fitzgibbon, S., Westphal, R., Carone, D., Beckmann, C. F., & Smith, S. M. (2017). Hand classification of fMRI ICA noise components. NeuroImage, 154, 188-205.