Poster No:
1427
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Vera Komeyer1,2,3, Simon Eickhoff1,2, Jan Kasper1,2, Christian Grefkes4,5, Kaustubh Patil1,2, Federico Raimondo1,2
Institutions:
1Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany, 2Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany, 3Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany, 4Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 5Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne and Medical Faculty, University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
First Author:
Vera Komeyer
Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf|Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Center Juelich|Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf
Duesseldorf, Germany|Juelich, Germany|Duesseldorf, Germany
Co-Author(s):
Simon Eickhoff
Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf|Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Center Juelich
Duesseldorf, Germany|Juelich, Germany
Jan Kasper
Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf|Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Center Juelich
Duesseldorf, Germany|Juelich, Germany
Christian Grefkes
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt|Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne and Medical Faculty, University Cologne
Frankfurt am Main, Germany|Cologne, Germany
Kaustubh Patil
Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf|Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Center Juelich
Duesseldorf, Germany|Juelich, Germany
Federico Raimondo
Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf|Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Center Juelich
Duesseldorf, Germany|Juelich, Germany
Introduction:
Hand grip strength (HGS) not only reflects overall strength, but is also closely related to physical disability, cognitive decline and mortality [2,8,5]. Recognized by the WHO as a key marker for vitality in aging populations [1], HGS is a cost-efficient and reliable measure in clinical practice. Despite its ubiquity, the neural mechanisms governing HGS remain unclear. Our study systematically developed and evaluated the combination of neuroimaging-derived features with machine learning models to predict HGS. The aim was to identify models that are solely driven by brain information free from confounding factors such as sex, age and body composition, of which particularly sex but als age strongly correlates with HGS. Such confound-free models are essential to shed light on the neural basis of HGS.
Methods:
We predicted HGS from 9 feature categories in the UK Biobank [3] (N = 22554-33136) including gray matter volume (GMV) [10], functional fALFF, LCOR, GCOR [7] (each 1088 ROIs), cortical thickness, white surface area, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) with PSMD [4], gray white contrast and a collection of 6 white matter microstructural characteristics (Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean Diffusivity (MD), free water volume fraction (ISOVF), orientation dispersion index (OD), intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF), diffusion tensor mode (MO)). For each of the 9 categories 80% data were used to train seven algorithms in a 5-fold (nested) cross validation (CV) (Fig. 1A). Features were univariately, linearly adjusted for six confounder setups (Fig. 1B) in a CV-consistent manner. A final model was trained on the entire training data for out of sample (OOS) predictions on 20% held-out test data. Because of the particularly high influence of sex on linear predictions but less on non-linear predictions (Fig. 1B), we additionally classified sex with a XGBoost classifier with and without linear sex-adjustment to investigate the residual non-linear sex information after confound removal. The same analyses were performed on sex-split data. Six most successful sex-split and age-regressed models underwent SHAP analysis [6] to investigate relevant features for successful models.
Results:
The sex-mixed sample analysis identified GMV, white surface, fALFF and white matter as most predictive features (Fig. 1B). Predictability decreased noticeably when adjusting for sex and age, but didn't drop further when removing more confounders (Fig. 1B). Non-linear algorithms performed better than linear ones in the sex-age-adjusted scenario (Fig. 1B purple vs. blue). Classifying sex with and without linear removal of sex suggests that non-linear algorithm superiority is driven by residual non-linear sex information in the features (Fig. 1C). Nonetheless, non-linear approaches also showed superior performance in "sex-split" models, even after controlling for age (Fig. 1D). GMV, fALFF and white matter were most resilient for this very stringent confounder control (Fig. 1D). For these three feature categories XGBoost excelled other non-linear algorithms, leading to the six (3 per sex) best models: r(m)GMV = 0.18, r(f)GMV = 0.20; r(m)fALFF = 0.18, r(f)fALFF = 0.23; r(m)WM = 0.21, r(f)WM = 0.23 (Fig. 1F). Interpretative SHAP analyses suggested GMV's importance in anterior globus pallidus (Fig. 2A, B) and microstructural characteristics of sensory input bundles to the thalamus and thalamo-cortical tracts (Fig. 2E, F) as neural correlates for successful, confound-free HGS predictions.

·Fig. 1 - Comparison of ML models for cofound-free HGS prediction from imaging derived phenotypes

·Fig. 2 - SHAP feature importance analysis for best performing confound-free models
Conclusions:
Our exhaustive evaluation of ML models and features from diverse MRI modalities identified six effective models for predicting HGS under stringent confounding constraints. Such strict constraints allow us to conclude that the successful models rely on neural information independent of any sex and linear age signal in the features. Further investigations will delve into feature collinearities and the intricate interplay of feature modalities to gain a better understanding of the underlying biology.
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Classification and Predictive Modeling 1
Multivariate Approaches 2
Motor Behavior:
Motor Behavior Other
Keywords:
Cerebellum
Cortex
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Machine Learning
Motor
MRI
Multivariate
STRUCTURAL MRI
Sub-Cortical
White Matter
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
[1] Afable, S. B. (2022), ‘Normative values of hand grip strength of older Filipinos aged 60 to 85 years’, Aging Health Research, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 100108.
[2] Alfaro-Acha, A. (2006), ‘Handgrip strength and cognitive decline in older Mexican Americans’, The Journals of GerontologySeries A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 859–865.
[3] Alfaro-Almagro, F. (2018), ‘Image processing and Quality Control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank’, NeuroImage, vol. 166, pp. 400–424, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.034.
[4] Baykara, E. (2016), ‘A novel imaging marker for small vessel disease based on skeletonization of white matter tracts and diffusion histograms’, Annals of Neurology, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 581–592.
[5] Leong, D. P. (2015), ‘Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study’, The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 9990, pp. 266–273.
[6] Lundberg, S. M. (2017), ‘A unified approach to interpreting model predictions’, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30.
[7] Omidvarnia, A. (2023), ‘Is resting state fMRI better than individual characteristics at predicting cognition?’, BioRxiv Preprint Server For Biology, pp. 2023–02.
[8] Rantanen, T. (1999), ‘Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability’, JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 281, no. 6, pp. 558–560.
[9] Wagner, A. S. (2022), ‘FAIRly big: A framework for computationally reproducible processing of large-scale data’, Nature Scientific Data, vol. 9, no. 80, p. 25.