The effects of personalized tPBM based on Machine Learning-based QEEG phenotypes

Poster No:

1651 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Juhee Ko1, Ukeob Park2, Boeun Choi3, Seung Wan Kang3

Institutions:

1iMediSync Inc., Seoul, Seoul, 2iMediSync, Inc., Seoul, seoul, 3iMediSync, Seoul, Seoul

First Author:

Juhee Ko  
iMediSync Inc.
Seoul, Seoul

Co-Author(s):

Ukeob Park  
iMediSync, Inc.
Seoul, seoul
Boeun Choi  
iMediSync
Seoul, Seoul
Seung Wan Kang  
iMediSync
Seoul, Seoul

Introduction:

Over the past 40 years, numerous studies have clustered Quantitative Electroencephalogram(QEEG) into phenotypes for clinical and research purposes.[1,2,3,4] Particularly, phenotypes based on the alpha band are notable.[5,6] Furthermore, recent research has been actively conducted using QEEG and Transcranial photobiomodulation(tPBM) for the treatment and diagnosis of various brain diseases.[7,8] However, it remains unclear how the effects of tPBM manifest in terms of EEG, cognitive function, and emotions based on the power spectral density(PSD) pattern of the occipital lobe. In this study, clustering was performed using a machine learning algorithm(ML)(Gaussian Mixture Method(GMM)+Support Vector Machine(SVM)) based on the PSD phenotype of the occipital lobe. Subsequently, a suitable tPBM protocol was applied on a case-by-case basis according to the characteristics of each cluster, and we provide insights into the altered QEEG pattern and the effects on cognitive function and emotions after tPBM.

Methods:

We utilized EEG data measured at 19 channels on the 10-20 system in the resting state from a total of 104 subjects. Both eyes-closed and eyes-open data were employed as the dataset for the clustering model. As QEEG features used in the model, we utilized spectrum power and power ratio from the occipital lobe. Additionally, the participants include both normal and abnormal data. Among these 104 data, 80% were used as the train set, and the remaining 20% were used as the test set. We applied the Clustering Method (GMM) to select meaningful features for forming clusters, and subsequently trained the model using those features previously chosen as features for the Classification Method (SVM).The features of each cluster classified by the clustering model were used as criteria for labeling, and subsequently, these labels were employed as criteria for evaluating the performance of the classification model. The labels used were based on the commonly used QEEG phenotype criteria[1]. Cluster 1 corresponds to Persistent eyes-open alpha in the occipital lobe, Cluster 2 represents Low-voltage fast alpha in the occipital lobe during eyes-closed states, Cluster 3 includes complex abnormal patterns, and Cluster 4 denotes normal patterns (presence of alpha in the occipital lobe during eyes-closed states, and more than a 50% decrease in alpha during eyes-open states).Using the trained model, we classified 58 subjects into four groups and applied personalized tPBM protocols for each group over 8 weeks (3 sessions per week, 10 minutes per session). Subsequently, we evaluated the personalized tPBM effects on individualized changes in EEG, cognitive functions (comprehensive memory, inference ability, executive function, processing speed), and emotions (depression, stress, trait anxiety, state anxiety) through EEG examinations and questionnaires.

Results:

The accuracy of the classification model on the training set exhibited an F1 score of 0.88, Precision of 0.88, and Recall of 0.88. On the test set, the model showed an F1 score of 0.86, Precision of 0.86, and Recall of 0.88. Furthermore, the effects of tPBM for each cluster based on the results of the trained model showed a significant increase (p-value < 0.01) in processing speed and executive function among cognitive function indicators. Additionally, among emotional indicators, a significant decrease (p-value < 0.05) was observed in depression, state anxiety, trait anxiety, and stress.

Conclusions:

This study, through a machine learning-based clustering model using QEEG phenotypes as a foundation, identified meaningful clusters and demonstrated significant positive effects on cognitive function and emotions through the implementation of personalized tPBM based on these clusters. Such personalized tPBM can be more effectively utilized for the treatment of cognitive function and emotions. Further development of diverse QEEG phenotypes is expected to broaden its application as a biomarker for brain diseases.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Classification and Predictive Modeling 2
EEG/MEG Modeling and Analysis 1

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

EEG
NIRS

Keywords:

Anxiety
Attention Deficit Disorder
Cognition
Computational Neuroscience
Data analysis
Data Organization
Electroencephaolography (EEG)
Machine Learning
Modeling
Treatment

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Johnstone, J. (2005a, September), 'QEEG patterns: Subgroups, profiles, phenotypes', Paper presented at the 13th annual meeting of the International Society for Neuronal Regulation, Denver, CO.
2. Johnstone, J. (2005), 'Clinical database development: characterization of EEG phenotypes', Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 2005 Apr;36(2):99-107. doi: 10.1177/155005940503600209.
3. Walker JE. (2010), 'Recent advances in quantitative EEG as an aid to diagnosis and as a guide to neurofeedback training for cortical hypofunctions, hyperfunctions, disconnections, and hyperconnections: improving efficacy in complicated neurological and psychological disorders', Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Mar;35(1):25-7. doi: 10.1007/s10484-009-9107-0.
4. Robertson C. (2022), 'Quantitative EEG (qEEG) guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment for depression and anxiety disorders: An open, observational cohort study of 210 patients', Journal of Affective Disorders, 2022 Jul 1;308:322-327. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.076.
5. McVoy M. (2019), 'Resting-State Quantitative Electroencephalography Demonstrates Differential Connectivity in Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder', Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, Jun;29(5):370-377. doi: 10.1089/cap.2018.0166.
6. Pérez-Elvira R. (2021), 'Individual Alpha Peak Frequency, an Important Biomarker for Live Z-Score Training Neurofeedback in Adolescents with Learning Disabilities', Brain Sciences, Jan 28;11(2):167. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020167.
7. Baik JS. (2021), 'Effects of Photobiomodulation on Changes in Cognitive Function and Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Uncontrolled Trial', Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2021;83(4):1513-1519. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210386.
8. Dole M. (2023), 'A systematic review of the effects of transcranial photobiomodulation on brain activity in humans', Reviews in The Neurosciences, 2023 Mar 17;34(6):671-693. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2023-0003.