An Endogenic Attentional Visuomotor Regulator

Poster No:

74 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Yiqing Hu1, Hao Zhang2, Xiaoli Li3, Yan Song3, Zaixu Cui1, Chenguang Zhao4

Institutions:

1Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China, 2School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 3State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 4Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, Beijing

First Author:

Yiqing Hu  
Chinese Institute for Brain Research
Beijing, China

Co-Author(s):

Hao Zhang  
School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China
Xiaoli Li  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China
Yan Song  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China
Zaixu Cui  
Chinese Institute for Brain Research
Beijing, China
Chenguang Zhao  
Chinese Institute for Brain Research
Beijing, Beijing

Introduction:

Attention is not constant but fluctuates from moment to moment(Esterman & Rothlein, 2019). Although a lot of studies have found alpha (8-12 Hz) synchrony appears to influence sensory processing during visual attention tasks(Esterman & Rothlein, 2019; Foxe et al., 1998; Fu et al., 2001; Herrmann & Knight, 2001), most of them only show correlation but not causality(Peylo et al., 2021). Here, we established a cognitive brain-machine interface (cBMI)(Chinchani et al., 2022), which was designed to monitor real-time alpha oscillations and was proved to regulate endogenous attention in visuomotor tasks successfully.

Methods:

2 electroencephalograph (EEG) experiments with 75 young adults aged 18-28 years old were included in our study. A cartoon visual search paradigm with 5 green planes (non-target) and one yellow plane (target) distributed in a clockwise manner (Fig. 1A). Participants were asked to use the computer joystick, an efficient and cost-effective response device for recording continuous movements(Szul et al., 2020), to maneuver to the target position while maintaining their gaze on the central fixation. In this case, we can precisely measure participants' response time and belief time (Fig. 1B). Experiment 1 (N = 50) was designed to find the neural biomarker related to different attention levels in which the target search array appeared in 10 Hz frequency between 2-10 s intertrial interval after response end (Fig. 1C). Importantly, in experiment 2 (N = 25), we monitored the positive or negative biomarker contained from experiment 1 every second to determine the target appeared time which demonstrated our system can casually regulate the endogenic attentional visuomotor in real-time (Fig. 1D). The EEG recording, preprocessing processes, and EEG analyses methods, including N2pc (time-locked to target onset), alpha power, and channel tuning functions (CTFs) were based on the former attention studies(Jensen & Mazaheri, 2010; Zhao et al., 2023).
Supporting Image: figure1.png
   ·Experimental paradigm. A) Visual pop-out search paradigm with 5 green planes (non-target) and one yellow plane (target) distributed in a clockwise manner. The participants were instructed to maintain
 

Results:

In experiment 1, we found different cognitive protocols connected to attention fluctuates that the alpha power decreased in good performance trials but increased in bad performance trials (Fig. 2A). In experiment 2, the belief time became shorter (t = -2.378, p < 0.05) when using the positive protocol (when alpha power decreased in the test segment, the target search array will appear) than using the negative protocol (target search array only appeared while alpha power increased) (Fig. 2B). N2pc component which appears to reflect target selection(Eimer, 1996) was larger in the negative protocol condition than in the positive protocol condition (t = -2.248, p < 0.05), which indicated that in the positive attention condition, benefit in the spatial representation for target selection during the search array is no longer needed (Fig. 2C). CTFs which reflect the spatial distribution of alpha power measured by scalp after the target search array for positive and negative protocol condition (Fig. 2D). The time-resolved slope of CTFs results suggest that alpha power tracked the target location earlier in positive condition (T = 175 ms) than in the negative protocol condition (T = 412 ms) (Fig. 2E).
Supporting Image: figure2.png
   ·Main results. A) alpha power changes in good performance trials (left) and bad performance trials (right) in experiment 1. B) The belief time, start-up time, response time (RT), and response error (th
 

Conclusions:

Taken together, we monitored real-time alpha oscillations attached to attention fluctuations and successfully regulated endogenous attention to motivate better behavior performance. This work may be helpful in understanding the mechanism of attention and can be applied to improve cognition in diverse psychiatric disorders, including ADHD and schizophrenia.

Brain Stimulation:

Non-Invasive Stimulation Methods Other 1

Higher Cognitive Functions:

Executive Function, Cognitive Control and Decision Making

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

EEG/MEG Modeling and Analysis

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

EEG

Perception, Attention and Motor Behavior:

Attention: Visual 2

Keywords:

Cognition
Motor
Vision
Other - EEG; Attention; cBMI

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

Chinchani, A. M. (2022). Tracking momentary fluctuations in human attention with a cognitive brain-machine interface. Communications Biology, 5(1), 1346.
Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99(3), 225–234.
Esterman, M. (2019). Models of sustained attention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 174–180.
Foxe, J. J. (1998). Parieto-occipital approximately 10 Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms. Neuroreport, 9(17), 3929–3933.
Fu, K.-M. G.m(2001). Attention-dependent suppression of distracter visual input can be cross-modally cued as indexed by anticipatory parieto–occipital alpha-band oscillations. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(1), 145–152.
Herrmann, C. S. (2001). Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(6), 465–476.
Jensen, O. (2010). Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 186.
Peylo, C.m(2021). Cause or consequence? Alpha oscillations in visuospatial attention. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(9), 705–713.
Szul, M. J.m(2020). The validity and consistency of continuous joystick response in perceptual decision-making. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 681–693.
Zhao, C. (2023). Suppression of distracting inputs by visual-spatial cues is driven by anticipatory alpha activity. PLOS Biology, 21(3), e3002014.