Enhanced Functional Connectivity Representation by Contrastive Learning for Brain Disease Diagnosis

Poster No:

1410 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Wonsik Jung1, Heung-Il Suk1

Institutions:

1Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

First Author:

Wonsik Jung  
Korea University
Seoul, Republic of Korea

Co-Author:

Heung-Il Suk  
Korea University
Seoul, Republic of Korea

Introduction:

Deep learning models utilizing resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) have been widely used for diagnosing psychiatric conditions like major depressive disorder (MDD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the high costs of data collection and the inherent complex, high-dimensional nature of rs-fMRI data limits its availability, affecting both the statistical power and generalizability of these models in clinical settings [1]. To overcome these issues, existing studies focus on two main strategies: i) data augmentation and ii) transfer learning. The objective of this work is to introduce a novel framework combining multi-view region masking with a self-supervised learning approach, leveraging these strategies to enhance the diagnosis and analysis of brain disorders.

Methods:

As depicted in Figure 1(a), our proposed framework is structured into two phases: i) the pretext model, which serves as the backbone network using an autoencoder (AE)-based architecture. This model is designed to learn enriched functional representation through functional connectivity (FC) from unlabeled fMRI data and ii) a fine-tuning model trained on labeled (unseen) fMRI data for brain disorder-specific tasks. To be specific, for the pretext model, we employ a random ROI-level masking strategy [2] to augment the FC matrices and then feed into the shared networks for inter-regional relation learning in a self-supervised learning manner. Henceforth, this model undergoes fine-tuning to refine functional representation for brain disorder-specific diagnosis and analysis.
Supporting Image: OHBM_Figure1.png
   ·(a) Overview of our proposed framework. (b) Comparison of the masking ratio between our proposed method and baseline [2]
 

Results:

We compared our proposed framework with AE-based approaches [2] and state-of-the-art methods [6,7,8]. Our method achieved superior results in 5-fold cross-validation, with an average accuracy of 73.38% (±3.01) and an AUC of 0.778 (±0.045) on the ABIDE dataset, and similarly, an accuracy of 75.95% (±2.64) and an AUC of 0.830 (±0.035) on the REST-MDD dataset, surpassing all competing methods. Furthermore, to validate the generalizability of our approach, we implemented an ablation study, which involved altering the ratio of random ROI-level masking (as shown in Figure 1(b)) and conducting cross-site classification. Lastly, we applied layer-wise relevance propagation [9] to obtain insights into the interconnections across multi-institutional datasets. As depicted in Figure 2, we observed statistically significant representative regions between groups, colored red for p<0.05 (SOG.L, MOG.L, SPG.R, ANG.R, PCUN.L, PCUN.R, PAL.R, CRBL6.R, IFGoperc.L), yellow for p<0.01 (SMA.R, OLF.R, REC.R, ACG.L, ACG.R, HIP.L, CAL.L, FFG.L, SMG.R, CRBL9.L), and green for p<0.001 (MFG.R, PAL.L).
Notably, among them, specific regions (e.g., the superior occipital gyrus (SOG), middle occipital gyrus (MOG), superior parietal gyrus (SPG), angular gyrus (ANG), precuneus (PCUN), hippocampus (HIP), anterior cingulate gyrus (ACG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG)) have been confirmed to be associated with autism.
Supporting Image: OHBM_Figure2.png
   ·Visualization of statistically significant brain regions in ASD.
 

Conclusions:

We introduce a novel deep learning framework for diagnosing psychiatric disorders using fMRI, effectively addressing the challenges of high data collection costs and data complexity. Our framework, integrating multi-view region masking with self-supervised learning, consists of a two-phase approach: an AE-based model for training from unlabeled data and a fine-tuning model for specific brain disorders. Through extensive experiments conducted on two multi-institutional datasets, our method demonstrated the superiority of accuracy and generalizability compared to comparative methods, with layer-wise relevance propagation providing further insights into critical brain regions for diagnosis.

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodevelopmental/ Early Life (eg. ADHD, autism)
Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia)

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Classification and Predictive Modeling 1
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2

Keywords:

Autism
Data analysis
DISORDERS
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Machine Learning
Psychiatric Disorders

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

[1] Grady, C.L., et al., (2021), ‘Influence of Sample Size and Analytic Approach on Stability and Interpretation of Brain‐behavior Correlations in Task‐related fMRI Data’, Human Brain Mapping, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 204-219.
[2] Jung, W., et al., (2021), ‘Inter-Regional High-Level Relation Learning From Functional Connectivity via Self-Supervision’, Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference.
[3] Di Martino, A., et al., (2014), ‘The Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange: Towards a Large-Scale Evaluation of the Intrinsic Brain Architecture in Autism’, Molecular Psychiatry, Vo. 19 no. 6, pp. 659-667.
[4] Yan, C.-G., et al., (2019), ‘Reduced Default Mode Network Functional Connectivity in Patients With Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116 no. 18, pp. 9078-9083.
[5] Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., et al., (2002), ‘Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in Spm Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the Mni MRI Single-Subject Brain’, Neuroimage, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 273-289.
[6] Eslami, T., et al., (2019), ‘ASD-Diagnet: A Hybrid Learning Approach for Detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using fMRI Data’, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, vol. 13, no. 70.
[7] Kawahara, J., et al. (2017), ‘BrainNetCNN: Convolutional Neural Networks for Brain Networks; Towards Predicting Neurodevelopment’, NeuroImage, vol. 146, pp. 1038-1049.
[8] Kan, X., et al. (2022), ‘Brain Network Transformer’, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 25586-25599.
[9] Montavon, G., et al., (2017), ‘Explaining Nonlinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decomposition’, Pattern Recognition, vol. 65, pp. 211-222.

Acknowledgement: This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (No. 2022R1A4A1033856)