Poster No:
2540
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Sharif Kronemer1, Micah Holness1, Burak Akin1, Javier Gonzalez-Castillo1, Laurentius (Renzo) Huber2, Paul Taylor1, A. Morgan1, Joshua Teves1, Victoria Gobo1, Daniel Handwerker1, Peter Bandettini1
Institutions:
1National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, 2Functional MRI Core Facility, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Burak Akin
National Institute of Mental Health
Bethesda, MD
Paul Taylor
National Institute of Mental Health
Bethesda, MD
A. Morgan
National Institute of Mental Health
Bethesda, MD
Joshua Teves
National Institute of Mental Health
Bethesda, MD
Introduction:
Afterimages are prolonged visual perceptions that typically follow adaptation to light stimulation. Afterimages have been a source of interest for centuries because they offer insight on the neural mechanisms of vision and conscious perception (Goethe, 1970). A lingering question is to what degree are retinal versus cortical processes involved in afterimages? Answering this query is significant for relating afterimages to other categories of conscious perception (e.g., imagery and hallucinations). While the retinal view of afterimages is dominant (e.g., the bleaching of photoreceptors; Brindley et al., 1962), there is evidence of post-retinal processes in the formation and modification of afterimages (e.g., Downey, 1901; Shimojo et al., 2001). Meanwhile, there is a limited number of neuroimaging studies on afterimages that would help to measure its central neural mechanisms. Accordingly, in the current experiment, we aimed to interrogate the whole brain and primary visual cortex layer fMRI signals underpinning afterimage perception.
Methods:
Healthy, adult participants (N = 34) completed a visual perception task where participants were shown images and afterimages. Afterimages were induced by a human face silhouette image. In initial task phases, participants reported on the perceptual sharpness, contrast, and duration of their afterimages. Participant perception reporting accuracy was confirmed on images with known sharpness, contrast, and duration. The afterimage perception reports were used to reconstruct a mock afterimage: an image that perceptually-matched the sharpness and contrast overtime of each participants' afterimage. In the main task phase, participants reported the onset and offset of their mock and real afterimages, during simultaneous eye-tracking (EyeLink 1000 Plus; SR Research, Inc.) and whole brain 7T fMRI was recorded (BOLD; voxel size: 1.2mm3; TR: 1000ms; Siemens, Inc.). A subset of participants (N = 12) also completed the main task while recording primary visual cortex (V1) cortical-layer resolution 7T fMRI (BOLD/VASO; voxel size 0.8mm3; TR: 3000ms, Siemens, Inc.). Analysis were completed with MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc.) and Analysis of Functional Neuroimages (AFNI) software.
Results:
The inducer stimulus reliably generated afterimages (>75% afterimage perception rate). Participants accurately reported on the image sharpness, contrast, and duration. The afterimage perceptual reports were sufficiently accurate such that a majority of participants (>90%) did not distinguish between their real and mock afterimages, even when they were presented side-by-side. Whole brain fMRI findings show that the mock and real afterimages recruit many of the same subcortical and cortical networks (Figure 1), including sensory regions (e.g., VI and fusiform gyrus [FG]), arousal and neuromodulatory regions (e.g., thalamus and brainstem), salience regions (e.g., insula and anterior cingulate cortex), and attention/detection regions (e.g., posterior parietal cortex [PPC] and dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]). However, the mock afterimage showed greater fMRI responses relative to the real afterimage in several regions (e.g., FG, PPC, and DLPFC), and real afterimage revealed fMRI decreases absent in the mock afterimage, particularly in the prefrontal cortex (Figure 2). Preliminary analyses of the V1 cortical layer fMRI responses suggest similar dynamics between the mock and real afterimages.

·Figure 1

·Figure 2
Conclusions:
As far as we know, the current investigation represents the first whole brain and layer fMRI study of human afterimage perception. These findings suggest that afterimages engage similar whole brain networks as normal sensory vision. However, in some brain areas, there are differences between mock and real afterimage conscious perception. Future analyses will interrogate subject-level dynamics (e.g., fMRI responses for participants with more or less vivid afterimage perception).
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
BOLD fMRI 2
Perception, Attention and Motor Behavior:
Consciousness and Awareness
Perception: Visual 1
Keywords:
Consciousness
Cortical Layers
FUNCTIONAL MRI
HIGH FIELD MR
NORMAL HUMAN
Perception
Vision
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Brindley, G.S., (1962), 'Two new properties of foveal after-images and a photochemical hypothesis to explain them', The Journal of Physiology, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 168-179.
Downey, J.E., (1901), 'An experiment on getting an after-image from a mental image', Psychological Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42-55.
Goethe, J.W.v., (1970), 'Theory of Colours', The MIT Press.
Shimojo, S., et al., (2001), 'Afterimage of perceptually filled-in surface', Science, vol. 293, no. 5535, pp. 1677-80.