Poster No:
2402
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Giulia Vallini1, Giorgia Baron1, Giulia Pagnin1, John Lee2, Andrei Vlassenko2, Manu Goyal2, Diego Cecchin3, Maurizio Corbetta4, Alessandra Bertoldo3
Institutions:
1University of Padua, Padua, Italy, 2Neuroimaging Laboratories at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St Louis, MO, 3Padova Neuroscience Center, Padua, Italy, 4Clinica Neurologica, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, Padova, Padova
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
John Lee
Neuroimaging Laboratories at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
St Louis, MO
Andrei Vlassenko
Neuroimaging Laboratories at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
St Louis, MO
Manu Goyal
Neuroimaging Laboratories at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
St Louis, MO
Maurizio Corbetta
Clinica Neurologica, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Padova, Padova
Introduction:
Glucose stands as the primary fuel source driving the energy-demanding process of neuronal activity. Glucose metabolism can be explored in vivo in human by [18F]FDG PET. DCM-based effective connectivity (EC) provides a linear mechanistic view of brain dynamics by conceiving it as a mixture of dissipative and solenoidal flow speaking to the concept of kinetic energy (Benozzo et al. 2023). This study aims to explore the association between kinetic energy and glucose metabolism by comparing EC-derived functional flow patterns with FDG PET measurements in healthy controls (HCs), finally investigating the disruption of this coupling in glioma patients.
Methods:
The rsfMRI data of 42 HCs are fully described in (Volpi et al. 2022), while rsfMRI data of 43 patients are outlined in (Silvestri et al. 2022). EC matrices, estimated through sparse DCM (Prando et al. 2020), are decomposed into Σ-1 (partial correlation of the neuronal states) and S (differential cross-covariance, expressing the temporal directionality of neural activation) as in (Benozzo et al. 2023). From dynamic PET data (60-min acquisitions for both datasets), individual Metabolic Connectivity (MC) matrices, expressing the relationships between the metabolic states of different brain regions, are estimated according to (Volpi et al. 2022). Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) is derived from static PET (sum of late frames 40-60 min) using whole-brain uptake for HCs (Byrnes et al. 2014) and ipsilateral cerebellum white matter for patients (Nozawa et al. 2015) as reference. We employ a clustered version of 100-area Yan Homotopic atlas (74 nodes, 7 RSNs) (Yan et al. 2023) plus 12 subcortical AAL3 ROIs (Rolls et al. 2020).
Partial Least Square Correlation (PLSC) is applied to HC pairs: Σ-1-MC, S-MC (upper triangular matrices), SUVR-Σ-1 and SUVR-S (nodal strengths for Σ-1 and S, ROI values for SUVR). Generalizability of multivariate correlations were cross-validated using a 7-fold procedure. For each generalizable effective-metabolic pair, the regression line between the scores was identified, defining a normality band at the 90-percentile of the HC distances from the line. Finally, patients' metabolic and effective variables are projected onto the maximizing-covariance latent space identified in HCs. A tumor frequency map was obtained by combining tumor masks as weighted by the corresponding distance from the HC regression line (out-of-range patients only). Analysis workflow in Fig. 1.

Results:
Cross-validation reveals good generalizability for Σ-1-MC and SUVR-S associations (Pearson's r>0.76). The scatterplots between metabolic and effective scores for HCs and patient projections are in Fig. 2B. In both pairs, some patients notably diverge from the expected metabolic-effective coupling independently of tumor volume. As shown in Fig. 2C, SUVR-S pair is mostly altered for temporo-parietal tumors, while Σ-1-MC is mainly disrupted in patients with frontal lesions.
Conclusions:
A dual metabolic-effective association emerges: one at local level (glucose uptake-node directionality) and one at network level (metabolic connectivity-partial correlation). Furthermore, our study unveils how these two distinct decoupling can differentiate patients based on the lesion location (and not its volume)-local disruption observed only for temporo-parietal lesions and network alterations for frontal lesions-providing novel insights into the physiopathology and the metabolic-kinetic link of glioma. While (Maleki Balajoo et al. 2022) already explored distinguishing pathologies (Alzheimer and Mild Cognitive Impairment) based on metabolism-function (FC metrics) coupling, our study is a pioneer in gliomas and the introduction of EC measures allows both to link metabolism to the concept of kinetic energy, but also to decouple neuronal activity from the adverse effects of hemodynamic convolution, proposing metabolic-effective coupling as a new biomarker.
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural) 2
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling
PET Modeling and Analysis
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
Multi-Modal Imaging 1
Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission :
Cerebral Metabolism and Hemodynamics
Keywords:
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Benozzo, Danilo, Giacomo Baggio, Giorgia Baron, Alessandro Chiuso, and Alessandra Bertoldo. 2023. “Analyzing Asymmetry in Brain Hierarchies with a Linear State-Space Model of Resting-State FMRI Data.” https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.04.565625.
Byrnes, Kimberly R., Colin M. Wilson, Fiona Brabazon, Ramona Von Leden, Jennifer S. Jurgens, Terrence R. Oakes, and Reed G. Selwyn. 2014. “FDG-PET Imaging in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Critical Review.” Frontiers in Neuroenergetics 6 (JAN).
Maleki Balajoo, Somayeh, Farzaneh Rahmani, Reza Khosrowabadi, Chun Meng, Simon B. Eickhoff, Timo Grimmer, Mojtaba Zarei, Alexander Drzezga, Christian Sorg, and Masoud Tahmasian. 2022. “Decoupling of Regional Neural Activity and Inter-Regional Functional Connectivity in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Simultaneous PET/MR Study.” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 49 (9): 3173–85.
Nozawa, Asae, Ali Hosseini Rivandi, Masayuki Kanematsu, Hiroaki Hoshi, David Piccioni, Santosh Kesari, and Carl K. Hoh. 2015. “Glucose-Corrected Standardized Uptake Value in the Differentiation of High-Grade Glioma versus Post-Treatment Changes.” Nuclear Medicine Communications 36 (6): 573–81.
Prando, Giulia, Mattia Zorzi, Alessandra Bertoldo, Maurizio Corbetta, Marco Zorzi, and Alessandro Chiuso. 2020. “Sparse DCM for Whole-Brain Effective Connectivity from Resting-State FMRI Data.” NeuroImage 208 (December 2019): 116367.
Rolls, Edmund T., Chu Chung Huang, Ching Po Lin, Jianfeng Feng, and Marc Joliot. 2020. “Automated Anatomical Labelling Atlas 3.” NeuroImage 206 (August 2019): 116189.
Silvestri, Erica, Manuela Moretto, Silvia Facchini, Marco Castellaro, Mariagiulia Anglani, Elena Monai, Domenico D’Avella, et al. 2022. “Widespread Cortical Functional Disconnection in Gliomas: An Individual Network Mapping Approach.” Brain Communications 4 (2): 1–14.
Volpi, Tommaso, Giulia Vallini, Erica Silvestri, Mattia De Francisci, Tony Durbin, Maurizio Corbetta, John J Lee, et al. 2022. “A New Framework for Metabolic Connectivity Mapping Using Bolus [ 18 F]FDG PET and Kinetic Modelling.” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 1–21.
Yan, Xiaoxuan, Ru Kong, Aihuiping Xue, Qing Yang, Csaba Orban, Lijun An, Avram J. Holmes, et al. 2023. “Homotopic Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Resting-State Functional Connectivity.” NeuroImage 273 (October 2022): 120010.