Predictive Modeling of Brain Age for Evaluating Cognitive Brain Aging in Hearing Loss

Poster No:

1154 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Yen-Jung Pan1, Chen-Yuan Kuo1,2, Huei-Yu Tsai1, Liang-Kung Chen3,4, Ching-Po Lin1,4,5

Institutions:

1Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital (managed by Taipei Veterans General Hospital), Taipei, Taiwan, 4Center for Healthy Longevity and Aging Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, 5Department of Education and Research, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

First Author:

Yen-Jung Pan  
Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Taipei, Taiwan

Co-Author(s):

Chen-Yuan Kuo  
Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University|Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan|Taipei, Taiwan
Huei-Yu Tsai  
Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Taipei, Taiwan
Liang-Kung Chen  
Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital (managed by Taipei Veterans General Hospital)|Center for Healthy Longevity and Aging Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Taipei, Taiwan|Taipei, Taiwan
Ching-Po Lin  
Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University|Center for Healthy Longevity and Aging Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University|Department of Education and Research, Taipei City Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan|Taipei, Taiwan|Taipei, Taiwan

Introduction:

The occurrence of hearing loss in midlife may play a pivotal role in contributing to dementia [1]. Prior research shows that prolonged auditory deprivation not only accelerates whole-brain atrophy and impairs executive function, but also leads to alterations in both auditory and visual connectivity, potentially affecting visual processing abilities [2,3,4]. These findings suggest potential advanced brain aging in hearing loss. However, it remains uncertain whether this phenomenon impacts the whole brain or only accelerates aging in specific cognitions. Recently, the brain age prediction framework, utilizing extensive neuroimaging data and machine learning techniques, has been employed to capture and elucidate the process of brain aging [5]. Hence, our aims were to construct brain age frameworks encompassing both the whole brain and specific cognition, and to explore whether individuals with hearing loss undergo advanced brain aging.

Methods:

T1-weighted MRI data from 1482 healthy participants (age range: 18-92 years; 681 males, 801 females) were obtained from 5 site for training dataset to construct the brain age estimators. The study comprised normal-hearing (NH) group (n=51, 22M/29F) and group with hearing loss (HL) (n=67, 46M/21F) from the I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study (ILAS). All participants underwent two follow-up examinations, on average 2.28 years apart. T1-weighted image preprocessing followed a previously described procedure and individual gray matter volume (GMV) and gray matter density (GMD) maps were estimated [5]. The hearing-related cognitive masks, encompassing memory, hearing, executive, and vision, were defined through a meta-analysis utilizing a machine learning framework [6]. Subsequently, we utilized the structural covariance network framework with both the whole-brain and the hearing-related gray matter mask to independently extract 600 features of the GM signature (300 GMV and 300 GMD) for the brain age model construction. RBF-SVR algorithm was employed for constructing a brain age estimator with a nested 5-fold cross-validation scheme on the training dataset. Model performance was assessed using the mean absolute error (MAE) and (R²) between chronological and predicted age. Each optimized brain age estimator was then applied to the HL and NH groups to estimate individual predicted brain age and calculate the brain age gap (BAG), representing the difference between chronological age and predicted brain age. To control for confounding effects, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was employed to compare global and hearing-related BAGs between NH and HL groups, with age, age², sex, years of education, and total intracranial volume (TIV) included as nuisance variables. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results:

The constructed global brain age estimator and hearing-related cognitive brain age estimators demonstrated satisfactory performance in the training dataset (global: MAE = 4.27 years, R² = 0.92; executive: MAE = 5.66 years, R² = 0.86; hearing: MAE = 6.81 years, R² = 0.79; memory: MAE = 6.50 years, R² = 0.82; vision: MAE = 6.41 years, R² = 0.82; Figure.1). Using the global brain age estimator, the HL group exhibited a significantly smaller BAG compared with the NH group in Wave 1 (p = 0.034) but not in Wave 2. In both Wave 1 and Wave 2, the HL group showed larger BAGs than the NH group in memory, hearing, and executive function, and a smaller BAG in vision, with no statistical differences (Table.1).
Supporting Image: Figure1.png
Supporting Image: Table1.png
 

Conclusions:

In summary, we presented a framework for hearing-related brain age estimators to explore different cognitive brain aging in hearing loss individuals. Although our study did not yield statistically significant evidence of a noteworthy increase in the BAG within each cognitive brain age estimator for the hearing loss group, we observed an increasing trend in the BAGs for hearing, memory, and executive function. Cognitive brain age estimator showed promise in elucidating the mechanisms of brain aging associated with hearing loss.

Lifespan Development:

Aging 1

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Classification and Predictive Modeling 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Anatomical MRI

Keywords:

Aging
Cognition
Hearing
Machine Learning
MRI
STRUCTURAL MRI
Other - Brain age

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Livingston, G., et al. (2020), Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. The Lancet, vol. 396, no. 10248, pp.413-446.
2. Lin, F. R., Ferrucci, L., An, Y., Goh, J. O., Doshi, J., Metter, E. J., Davatzikos, C., Kraut, M. A. & Resnick, S. M. (2014), Association of hearing impairment with brain volume changes in older adults. Neuroimage, vol. 90, pp.84-92.
3. Rosemann, S., & Thiel, C. M. (2021), No association between age-related hearing loss and brain age derived from structural neuroimaging data. Neuroimage: Reports, vol. 1(2), no. 100020.
4. Scott, G. D., Karns, C. M., Dow, M. W., Stevens, C., & Neville, H. J. (2014), Enhanced peripheral visual processing in congenitally deaf humans is supported by multiple brain regions, including primary auditory cortex. Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 177.
5. Kuo, C.-Y., et al. (2021), Improving Individual Brain Age Prediction Using an Ensemble Deep Learning Framework. Front Psychiatry, vol. 12, pp. 1-11.
6. Beam, E., et al. (2021), A data-driven framework for mapping domains of human neurobiology. Nature neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1733-1744.