Neural Mechanisms of Mental Illness Knowledge Acquisition via 1st Person Perspective Virtual Reality

Poster No:

830 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Wey Guan Lem1, Kelssy Hitomi dos Santos Kawata1, Koki Ono1, Hiroshi Oyama1

Institutions:

1The University of Tokyo, Japan, Tokyo

First Author:

Wey Guan Lem  
The University of Tokyo
Japan, Tokyo

Co-Author(s):

Kelssy Hitomi dos Santos Kawata  
The University of Tokyo
Japan, Tokyo
Koki Ono  
The University of Tokyo
Japan, Tokyo
Hiroshi Oyama  
The University of Tokyo
Japan, Tokyo

Introduction:

The public stigma of mental illness is the general public's negative misconceptions about people with mental illness [1, 2]. Public stigma regarding mental illness significantly impacts individuals with such conditions, often leading to detrimental outcomes like employment disparities [3] and inhibited treatment-seeking behaviors [4]. First-person perspective (1PP) immersive virtual reality (IVR) anti-stigma intervention has emerged as a method to improve knowledge of mental illness knowledge [5, 6]. However, the neural correlates of individual difference in mental illness knowledge acquisition using 1PP IVR anti-stigma intervention and the effectiveness of stigma reduction has not yet been studied. This study explores the neurobiological underpinnings of how individual differences in mental illness knowledge acquisition manifest following a 1PP IVR anti-stigma intervention and the effectiveness of this intervention to the stigma reduction.

Methods:

Using a randomized cross-over trial, 32 right-handed native Japanese (14 female; M = 24.00, SD = 6.10 years) were randomized into either the IVR-control group or control-IVR group. As for the intervention, the IVR group used a 1PP Immersive Virtual Reality Anti-stigma (IVRAS) application via head-mounted display (HMD), while participants in the control group watched the same content of the 1PP IVRAS application through a computer screen. In the 1PP IVRAS application, participants took on the role of a person with mental illness in 1PP and experienced stigma from colleagues and support from family.

Pre- and post-intervention assessments included standardized measures for mental illness knowledge (MIDUS) and public stigma (RIBS-J), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning. During the fMRI scanning, all participants were asked to listen to the main auditory content of the 1PP IVRAS application while wearing a sleeping mask to minimize the visual effects generated on removing the HMD after using the IVR application.

For the behavioural data, the two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA and Friedman tests were conducted for MIDUS and RIBS-J, respectively, with time as a within-participant factor (pre- vs. post-intervention) and intervention type as the between-participant factor (IVR vs. control).

Regression analysis on the absolute changes in the MIDUS scores, mental illness knowledge acquisition brain activity was examined for each group. The voxel-wise statistics used an uncorrected p-value of <0.005 for the cluster-forming threshold and at a threshold of family-wise error (FWE)-corrected p-value of <0.05 for cluster extent.

The protocol received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine of the University of Tokyo (2019099NI).

Results:

Both the 1PP IVR and control groups showed improvement in mental illness knowledge acquisition score, but only the 1PP IVR group showed reduced public stigma score towards people with mental illness. Furthermore, distinct brain activation was identified for both groups. Mental illness knowledge acquisition using the 1PP IVRAS application was associated with right superior frontal gyrus (SFG) activation, a critical brain region for empathic concern when mentalizing about another person's illness [7]. In contrast, control group showed right anterior insula activation previously implicated in empathic distress about people with mental illness [8].

Conclusions:

Our findings indicate that 1PP IVRAS application specifically enhance mental illness knowledge retention and decrease public stigma by changing brain regions associated with empathic understanding. This suggests the potential of 1PP IVR in educational strategies for stigma reduction. By identifying the SFG's role in stigma intervention, this study opens avenues for targeted brain-based stigma mitigation approaches and underscores the importance of 1PP IVRAS in empathy-driven learning on stigma.

Emotion, Motivation and Social Neuroscience:

Social Neuroscience Other 1

Learning and Memory:

Skill Learning 2

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Other - virtual reality, public stigma, mental illness, first-person perspective

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Corrigan PW, Bink AB: The Stigma of Mental Illness. In: Encyclopedia of Mental Health. Volume 4, edn. Edited by Friedman HS. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2016: 230-234.

2. Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA: Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. Am J Public Health 1999, 89(9):1328-1333.

3. Hampson ME, Watt BD, Hicks RE: Impacts of stigma and discrimination in the workplace on people living with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20(1):1-11.

4. Schnyder N, Panczak R, Groth N, Schultze-Lutter F: Association between mental health-related stigma and active help-seeking: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2017, 210(4):261-268.

5. Hadjipanayi C, Michael-Grigoriou D: Arousing a wide range of emotions within educational virtual reality simulation about major depressive disorder affects knowledge retention. Virtual Reality 2021, 26(1):343-359.

6. Formosa NJ, Morrison BW, Hill G, Stone D: Testing the efficacy of a virtual reality‐based simulation in enhancing users’ knowledge, attitudes, and empathy relating to psychosis. Australian Journal of Psychology 2020, 70(1):57-65.

7. Shin WG, Woo CW, Jung WH, Kim H, Lee TY, Decety J, Kwon JS: The Neurobehavioral Mechanisms Underlying Attitudes Toward People With Mental or Physical Illness. Front Behav Neurosci 2020, 14:1-12.

8. Decety J, Lamm C: Empathy versus Personal Distress: Recent Evidence from Social Neuroscience. In: The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. edn.; 2009: 199-214.