A Robust Pipeline For Personalised Localisation of Brain Regions Using Image Quality Transfer

Poster No:

1400 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Ying-Qiu Zheng1, Harith Akram2, Stephen Smith1, Saad Jbabdi3

Institutions:

1University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, 2UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK, 3Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom

First Author:

Ying-Qiu Zheng  
University of Oxford
Oxford, Oxfordshire

Co-Author(s):

Harith Akram, MD  
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
London, UK
Stephen Smith  
University of Oxford
Oxford, Oxfordshire
Saad Jbabdi  
Oxford University
Oxford, United Kingdom

Introduction:

Accurate identification and localisation of brain regions in individual subjects is increasingly important in both neuroscience research and clinical practice. In functional neurosurgery, e.g. deep brain stimulation, targeting precision is essential for symptom relief in various neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, this task is hampered by the lack of distinct contrast for many target brain structures on conventional medical images and significant variability in individual brain anatomies. A common practice is to rely on standardised atlases, but this often fails to account for inter-individual variations [1-3].

Advancements in neuroimaging have enabled brain region localisation in individual brains. For instance, a popular approach is the use of connectivity-based functional localisation with tractography or resting-state connectivity, alongside prior knowledge of a region's connectional fingerprint. This however requires high-quality diffusion/functional MRI data, limiting application in clinical settings with scan-time constraints.

To address this challenge, we developed LOCALISE, a tool that enables individualised delineation of brain regions. The main purpose of this tool is to enable connectivity-based localisation in low-quality datasets. Using Image Quality Transfer (IQT) techniques [9-10], LOCALISE transfers anatomical information from large-scale high-quality MRI (e.g. HCP data) enabling functional localisation on clinical-quality data. Here, we focus on the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), a key DBS target for the treatment of tremor in Parkinson's patients, to demonstrate LOCALISE's capabilities, with ongoing work to incorporate more brain structures.

Methods:

Localising Vim illustrates the idea behind LOCALISE. In theory, Vim can be found using literature-based connectional information, namely the connections to M1 and the contralateral Cerebellum. However, these connections cannot be robustly extracted. Instead, LOCALISE creates a large number of more "robust" connectional features, and learns to segment Vim using these features and the high-quality prior-based segmentation as a target "ground truth". This mapping is then used on low-quality data where the direct prior-based method fails. To train LOCALISE for Vim, we used high-quality diffusion MRI data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) to generate Vim locations and trained an IQT model [10] to locate Vim in surrogate low-quality datasets based on their connectivity profiles.

The segmentation model employs a Conditional Random Field (CRF) [11] to map high-quality Vim labels to low-quality features. This CRF model is optimised to maximise the likelihood of correct HQ-Vim label assignments based on voxel-wise connectivity profiles. The trained model was then applied to left-out low-quality subjects and evaluated against their high-quality counterparts.
Supporting Image: fig1001.png
 

Results:

Using Vim localisation as an example, LOCALISE's accuracy was evaluated using the Dice coefficient and centroid displacement, the latter a measure of distance between the centroids of predicted and actual clusters. LOCALISE outperformed two established methods, the (original, simple) connectivity-driven and atlas-based approach, on HCP surrogate low-quality datasets, showing higher overlap with high-quality "ground truth" and greater reliability across varying data quality and scanning sessions. Notably, when applied to UK Biobank low-quality datasets, LOCALISE, trained on HCP data, generalised effectively, surpassing alternative methods in Vim localisation.
Supporting Image: fig2001.png
 

Conclusions:

LOCALISE offers robust localisation of brain regions even when using clinical-standard data, and has the potential to enhance targeting accuracy in neurosurgical procedures. Its adaptability to diverse data conditions makes it a valuable tool in settings where high-quality MRI is unavailable or inappropriate for certain cohorts. The tool can be found in https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/yqzheng1/python-localise.

Brain Stimulation:

Deep Brain Stimulation
Invasive Stimulation Methods Other

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Classification and Predictive Modeling 1
Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural)
Segmentation and Parcellation 2

Keywords:

Design and Analysis
Machine Learning
MRI
Open-Source Software
Segmentation
Tractography
Other - Surgical Targeting

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Finn, Emily S., et al. "Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity." Nature neuroscience 18.11 (2015): 1664-1671.
2. Johansen-Berg, Heidi, et al. "Functional–anatomical validation and individual variation of diffusion tractography-based segmentation of the human thalamus." Cerebral cortex 15.1 (2005): 31-39.
3. Morel, Anne, Michel Magnin, and Daniel Jeanmonod. "Multiarchitectonic and stereotactic atlas of the human thalamus." Journal of Comparative Neurology 387.4 (1997): 588-630.
4. Akram, Harith, et al. "Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor." NeuroImage: Clinical 18 (2018): 130-142.
5. Ferreira, Francisca, et al. "Ventralis intermedius nucleus anatomical variability assessment by MRI structural connectivity." NeuroImage 238 (2021): 118231.
6. Bertino, Salvatore, et al. "Ventral intermediate nucleus structural connectivity-derived segmentation: anatomical reliability and variability." Neuroimage 243 (2021): 118519.
7. Bridge, Holly, Stuart Clare, and Kristine Krug. "Delineating extrastriate visual area MT (V5) using cortical myeloarchitecture." Neuroimage 93 (2014): 231-236.
8. Glasser, Matthew F., and David C. Van Essen. "Mapping human cortical areas in vivo based on myelin content as revealed by T1-and T2-weighted MRI." Journal of neuroscience 31.32 (2011): 11597-11616.
9. Alexander, Daniel C., et al. "Image quality transfer and applications in diffusion MRI." NeuroImage 152 (2017): 283-298.
10. Zheng, Ying-Qiu, et al. "A Transfer Learning Approach to Localising a Deep Brain Stimulation Target." International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023.
11. Zheng, Shuai, et al. "Conditional random fields as recurrent neural networks." Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2015.