Poster No:
2292
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Hayeon Lee1, Kyeongseon Min1, Sooyeon Ji1, Jonghyo Youn1, Taechang Kim1, Beomseok Sohn2, Woo Jung Kim3,4, Chae Jung Park5, Soohwa Song6, Dong Hoon Shin6, Kyung Won Chang7, Na-Young Shin8, Phil Hyu Lee9, Yangsean Choi10, Yoonho Nam11, Koung Mi Kang12, Agnieszka Burzynska13,14, Catherine Lebel15, Jongho Lee1
Institutions:
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Institute of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 4Department of Psychiatry, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea, Republic of, 5Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea, Republic of, 6Heuron Co., Ltd, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 7Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 8Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 9Department of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 10Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 11Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Korea, Republic of, 12Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 13Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States, 14Department of Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Neurosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States, 15Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
First Author:
Hayeon Lee
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Co-Author(s):
Kyeongseon Min
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Sooyeon Ji
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Jonghyo Youn
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Taechang Kim
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Beomseok Sohn
Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Woo Jung Kim
Institute of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine|Department of Psychiatry, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, Korea, Republic of|Yongin, Korea, Republic of
Chae Jung Park
Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Yongin, Korea, Republic of
Kyung Won Chang
Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Na-Young Shin
Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Phil Hyu Lee
Department of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Yangsean Choi
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Yoonho Nam
Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Yongin, Korea, Republic of
Koung Mi Kang
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Agnieszka Burzynska
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University|Department of Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Neurosciences, Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO, United States|Fort Collins, CO, United States
Jongho Lee
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Introduction:
QSM and χ-separation8 quantify brain tissue susceptibility for studying neurodegenerative diseases. However, artifacts in data acquisition and processing can compromise accuracy, impacting reliability. It is important to recognize these artifacts and implement appropriate correction methods. The study analysed data from healthy subjects and patients in various groups and from different vendors and explored commonly encountered artifacts. The effects, origins, and potential solutions for these artifacts were investigated to improve the application of QSM and χ-separation.
Methods:
364 subjects (52.24 ± 25.78 years; 163 males and 201 females) from Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and alcohol-exposed adolescents development studies were scanned at six different 3T MRI scanners (Siemens Trio, Siemens Vida, Siemens Skyra, Philips Ingenia CX, Philips Ingenia Elition X, and GE Discovery 750w).
All data processing for QSM and χ-separation was performed using the χ-separation toolbox (https://github.com/SNU-LIST/chi-separation). Phases were unwrapped using a Laplacian-based algorithm7. V-SHARP9 was applied to remove background fields. QSM was calculated using QSMnet10. χ-sepnet-R2*6 and χ-sepnet-R2'6 were utilized calculating χpara and χdia maps.
Results:
Motion resulted in ghosting and blurring in QSM and χ-separation results (Fig. 1a). Respiration-induced B0 fluctuations hinder QSM and χ-separation (Fig. 1b), affecting reproducibility and accuracy of QSM and χ-separation results1. Post-acquisition correction for these artifacts is challenging without extra information such as B0-navigation. Incorrect coil combination introduced "phase singularities", and a localized high intensity region may appear (Fig. 1c), resolved by proper coil combination. GRAPPA algorithm reconstruction errors yield aliasing artifacts (Fig.1d), corrected by reprocessing raw data. Large slice thickness leads to QSM underestimation4, R2* overestimation3, and ultimately overestimation of both χpara and χdia (Fig. 1e), mitigated by using isotropic voxels of 1 mm or less4. Thin slabs cause significant QSM underestimation2,4 due to truncated non-local dipole, leading to underestimation of both dominant source in χpara and χdia maps (Fig. 2a,b). Data from P*** vendor sometimes contained linear field bias, causing residual phase wraps in QSM and χ-separation results (Fig. 1g) as the nonlinear complex data fitting approach for echo combination and phase unwrapping were utilized. Unwrapping phase at each TE and combining multi-echo images can be the solution. QSMnet may mistakenly use a local field map in radians instead of Hz, resulting in intensity range errors (Fig. 1h). Failure to correct B0 orientation during processing causes misalignment of the magnetic dipole kernel with B0 direction and susceptibility errors5 (Fig. 2c). Unintentionally flipped images impact alignment between T2-weighted and GRE magnitude images, leading to incorrect R2' maps. This can manifest as a prominent bright pattern in the cortical region in χpara and χdia (Fig. 2d). Vessel flow artifacts can impact adjacent regions, leading to erroneously high or low values in QSM and χ-separation results (Fig. 1k). To ensure accurate ROI analysis, it is advisable to exclude these affected regions.

·Figure 1. QSM and χ-separation results displaying various artifacts.

·Figure 2. Comparison between artifact and artifact-free images.
Conclusions:
We reported various artifacts in QSM and χ-separation from 364 subjects. Their origins and proposed practical solutions to mitigate their effects were investigated, thereby improving the precision and reliability of quantitative analysis in MRI studies. The inclusion of visual images as aids for artifact recognition benefits both researchers and practitioners, significantly enhancing data quality and interpretation across clinical and research studies.
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Methods Development
Motion Correction and Preprocessing 2
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
Anatomical MRI 1
Imaging Methods Other
Keywords:
Acquisition
Data analysis
MRI
Myelin
STRUCTURAL MRI
White Matter
Other - QSM
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
1. Choi, J. Y. (2019). ‘Improvement of reproducibility in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and transverse relaxation rates (R2*) after physiological noise correction’, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1769-1776.
2. Elkady, A. M. (2016). ‘Importance of extended spatial coverage for quantitative susceptibility mapping of iron-rich deep gray matter’, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 574-578.
3. Fernández‐Seara, M. A. (2000). ‘Postprocessing technique to correct for background gradients in image‐based R2* measurements’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 358-366.
4. Karsa, A., Punwani, S. (2019). ‘The effect of low resolution and coverage on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1833-1848.
5. Kiersnowski, O. C. (2023). ‘Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1791-1808.
6. Kim, M. (2022). ‘Chi-sepnet: Susceptibility source separation using deep neural network’, Proceedings of International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 30, 2464. Presented at the ISMRM 2022.
7. Schofield, M. A. (2003). ‘Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications’, Optics Letters, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 1194-1196.
8. Shin, H.-G. (2021). ‘χ-separation: Magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain’, NeuroImage, vol. 240, pp. 118371.
9. Wu, B. (2012). ‘Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 137-147.
10. Yoon, J. (2018). ‘Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet’, NeuroImage, vol. 179, pp. 199-206.