Investigating the neuromodulatory potential of the caudal zona incerta across species: a review

Poster No:

2154 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Violet Liu1, Alaa Taha2, Mohamed Abbass3, Abrar Ahmed4, Jason Kai5, Roy Haast6, Ali Khan2, Jonathan Lau7

Institutions:

1Western Univeristy, London, MT, 2University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, 3Western Univeristy, London, Ontario, 4Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, London, Ontario, 5Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, 6Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, Provence, 7Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, London, ON

First Author:

Violet Liu  
Western Univeristy
London, MT

Co-Author(s):

Alaa Taha  
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario
Mohamed Abbass, MD  
Western Univeristy
London, Ontario
Abrar Ahmed  
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery
London, Ontario
Jason Kai  
Robarts Research Institute, Western University
London, Ontario
Roy Haast  
Aix-Marseille University
Marseille, Provence
Ali Khan  
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario
Jonathan Lau  
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery
London, ON

Introduction:

The zona incerta (ZI), situated between the subthalamic nucleus and ventral thalamus, has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory target for Parkinson's Disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). Its role as a therapeutic target has been investigated in both animal models and clinical studies of deep brain stimulation (DBS; Plaha et al. 2006; Ossowska 2020; Plaha et al. 2011). Notably, the caudal region of ZI (cZI) is uniquely enriched in glutamatergic neurons, characterized by its extensive projection to the motor cortex and other subcortical regions implicated in motor control(Yang et al. 2022; Ossowska 2020). This intricate pattern of connectivity underscores its role in modulating postural and locomotion(Ossowska 2020; Wang et al. 2020), which is similarly reflected in a clinical setting, as DBS targeting of the cZI shows significant alleviation of motor symptoms in PD patients(Plaha et al. 2006; 2011; Blomstedt et al. 2018). Although rodent studies offer valuable insights into cZI organization, the neuroanatomical, cytoarchitectural, and genetic disparities between rodent and primate brains are substantial(Belmonte et al. 2015; Herculano-Houzel 2009; Molnár and Clowry 2012). The extent of neurochemical cross-species conservation of this structure remains poorly understood, insights into which could help to reveal the mechanism of action of cZI neuromodulation.

Methods:

Articles published in English were identified using PubMed. Keywords included combinations of "zona incerta" with "non-human primate", "marmoset", "rhesus monkey", "macaque", "rodent", "mouse", "rat", "human". Inclusion criteria were: 1) studies investigating the connectivity, cyto- or chemo-architecture of the ZI; 2) animal models of rodents, non-human primates, PD or ET patients; 3) direct visualization of the ZI for the treatment of neurological disorders.

Results:

This review summarizes and compares the anatomical, cellular, and molecular landscapes of the ZI between rodents, non-human primates, and humans, exploring their implications for the treatment of neurological disorders. Briefly, rodents have a larger ZI to brain ratio than primates, potentially driven by differential expansion patterns during brain development across species. The primate ZI also expresses different immunomarkers in its caudal region comparing to rodents, suggesting potential difference in cellular composition (Figure 1). Although connectivity patterns and molecular composition are largely conserved, rodents have an additional intermediolateral region of connectivity that has not been observed in primates (Figure 2). Key projection areas, such as the thalamus and motor cortex, of the primate cZI also demonstrate distinct genetic profiles when compared to rodents, indicating functional differences.
Supporting Image: Slide1.png
   ·Fig.1
Supporting Image: Slide2.png
   ·Fig.2
 

Conclusions:

We found the cZI is a highly conserved structure across rodents and primates, with subtle yet important molecular, connectomic, and anatomical inter-species differences. Improving our understanding of the neurochemical architecture of the cZI across species is critical for neuromodulatory advancements. An understanding of both electrode placement and molecular variations in cZI organization has the potential to impact treatment, enhance accurate interpretation of animal study findings in a clinical context, and ultimately improve patient outcome.

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodegenerative/ Late Life (eg. Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s)

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

Anatomy and Functional Systems 2
Microcircuitry and Modules
Subcortical Structures 1

Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission :

Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission Other

Keywords:

CHEMOARCHITECTURE
Cross-Species Homologues
Degenerative Disease
Dopamine
GABA
Glutamate
Movement Disorder
Neurotransmitter
NORMAL HUMAN
Sub-Cortical

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Belmonte, Juan Carlos Izpisua, Edward M. Callaway, Patricia Churchland, Sarah J. Caddick, Guoping Feng, Gregg E. Homanics, Kuo-Fen Lee, et al. 2015. “Brains, Genes and Primates.” Neuron 86 (3): 617–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.021.
2. Blomstedt, Patric, Rasmus Stenmark Persson, Gun-Marie Hariz, Jan Linder, Anna Fredricks, Björn Häggström, Johanna Philipsson, Lars Forsgren, and Marwan Hariz. 2018. “Deep Brain Stimulation in the Caudal Zona Incerta versus Best Medical Treatment in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomised Blinded Evaluation.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 89 (7): 710–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317219.
3. Herculano-Houzel, Suzana. 2009. “The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/neuro.09.031.2009.
4. Molnár, Zoltán, and Gavin Clowry. 2012. “Cerebral Cortical Development in Rodents and Primates.” Progress in Brain Research 195: 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53860-4.00003-9.
5. Ossowska, Krystyna. 2020. “Zona Incerta as a Therapeutic Target in Parkinson’s Disease.” Journal of Neurology 267 (3): 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09486-8.
6. Plaha, Puneet, Y. Ben-Shlomo, Nikunj K. Patel, and Steven S. Gill. 2006. “Stimulation of the Caudal Zona Incerta Is Superior to Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Improving Contralateral Parkinsonism.” Brain 129 (7): 1732–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl127.
7. Plaha, Puneet, Shazia Javed, David Agombar, Genevive O’ Farrell, Sadaquate Khan, Alan Whone, and Steven Gill. 2011. “Bilateral Caudal Zona Incerta Nucleus Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Outcome and Quality of Life.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 82 (8): 899–904. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.222992.
8. Wang, Xiyue, Xiao-lin Chou, Li I. Zhang, and Huizhong Whit Tao. 2020. “Zona Incerta: An Integrative Node for Global Behavioral Modulation.” Trends in Neurosciences 43 (2): 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.11.007.
9. Yang, Yang, Tao Jiang, Xueyan Jia, Jing Yuan, Xiangning Li, and Hui Gong. 2022. “Whole-Brain Connectome of GABAergic Neurons in the Mouse Zona Incerta.” Neuroscience Bulletin 38 (11): 1315–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00930-w.