Poster No:
1737
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Aliza Jaffer1, Kathryn Manning1, Gerald Giesbrecht1, Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen2, Catherine Lebel1
Institutions:
1University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Prenatal maternal psychological distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) can disrupt infant brain development and impact behaviour. During pregnancy, around 9-11% of individuals experience depression, while 18-25% experience elevated anxiety. The in-utero environment is directly influenced by prenatal distress. Such disruptions during critical periods of brain development may compromise developmental trajectories, potentially leading to lifelong consequences for cognitive, behavioural, and emotional functions in some children. Rates of psychological distress were substantially higher during the COVID-19 pandemic, raising concerns about its effect on infant development. We studied a cohort of pandemic-born infants and aimed to relate functional connectivity within brain networks across the first 2 years of life to prenatal distress and infant behaviour.
Methods:
Mother-infant pairs were recruited from the Pregnancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic (PdP) study. Eligibility for the PdP study were being <35 weeks pregnant, living in Canada, ≥17 years of age, and able to read and write in English or French. Prenatal maternal distress was quantified using a combined factor of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety. Infant magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at 3 months (n=63), 1 year (n=9), and 2 years (n=43) of age at the Alberta Children's Hospital using a GE 3T MR750w scanner with a 32-channel head coil (TR=2000 ms, TE=30 ms, voxel 3.6x3.6x3.6 mm3, flip angle=60º, 37 slices). 17 infants had scans for at least two timepoints. Parents assessed behaviour at 2 years using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire. MRI were preprocessed using FSL. MELODIC independent component analysis was used to remove volumes with excessive motion. Multi-session temporal concatenation was run using 3-month data to construct common spatial components and identify default mode (DMN), left frontoparietal (LFP), and executive control (EC) networks. Two regions of interest (ROIs) were defined in each network using 5 mm radii spheres placed at the hubs or peaks of connectivity networks (Figure 1): ROIs were in the anterior and posterior cingulate gyri (DMN), left angular gyrus and left precentral gyrus (LFP), and left and right superior frontal gyri (EC). Masks were generated using age-appropriate AAL atlases, where average time series were extracted and correlated for each subject to quantify functional connectivity within networks. Trajectories of connectivity and their relationship with prenatal distress were investigated using linear mixed effects models, including an interaction term between infant age and prenatal distress. Regression models were run to test relationships between distress, connectivity, and behaviour. Models were corrected for multiple comparisons using FDR.

Results:
Functional connectivity in the LFP network was significantly related to the interaction between age and prenatal distress (T=2.6, p=0.01, q=0.03, df=112) (Figure 2). Younger infants exposed to higher prenatal distress had weaker connectivity than infants exposed to lower prenatal distress; older infants exposed to higher prenatal distress had stronger connectivity than infants exposed to lower prenatal distress.
At 2 years of age, higher prenatal distress was related to stronger LFP network connectivity (T=2.8, p=0.008, q=0.024, df=39), and DMN connectivity was negatively associated with fine motor scores (T=-3.4, p=0.002, q=0.006, df=32).
Conclusions:
Higher order cognitive networks, including the frontoparietal network, typically display immature connectivity patterns at birth that mature over time. Our findings reveal distinct patterns of functional connectivity within the LFP network, suggesting that infants exposed to higher prenatal distress have faster development. DMN connectivity may also affect fine motor ability, motivating the need for continued monitoring of these infants through childhood.
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia) 2
Higher Cognitive Functions:
Reasoning and Problem Solving
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 1
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
BOLD fMRI
Keywords:
Anxiety
FUNCTIONAL MRI
PEDIATRIC
Other - depression; perinatal period; behaviour; pregnancy; longitudinal development; brain networks; maternal health
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
Agarwal, P.K. (2020), ‘Evaluation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ 3) as a developmental screener at 9, 18, and 24 months’, Early Human Development, vol 147, e105081.
Bergink, V. (2011), ‘Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy’, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 385–389.
Cella, D. (2019), ‘PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains’, Value in Health, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 537–544.
Dennis, C.L. (2017), ‘Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 210, no. 5, pp. 315–323.
Gao, W. (2015), ‘Development of human brain cortical network architecture during infancy’, Brain Structure & Function, vol. 220, no. 2, pp. 1173-1186.
Gao, W. (2017), ‘Functional Connectivity of the Infant Human Brain: Plastic and Modifiable’, Neuroscientist, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 169–184.
Gavin, N.I. (2005), ‘Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence’, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1071–1083.
Giesbrecht, G.F. (2021), ‘Protocol for the Pregnancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PdP) Study’, JMIR Research Protocols, vol. 10, no. 4, e25407.
Jenkinson, M. (2012), ‘FSL’, NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 782–790.
Lebel, C. (2020), ‘Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic’, Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 227, pp. 5–13.