Neonatal network topography predicts brain maturation and neurodevelopmental outcomes

Poster No:

1720 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Jianlong Zhao1,2,3, Tengda Zhao1,2,3, Yuehua Xu1,2,3, Hongming Li4,5, Lianglong Sun1,2,3, Xinyuan Liang1,2,3, Meizhen Han1,2,3, Zilong Zeng1,2,3, Yong He1,2,3,6

Institutions:

1State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 2Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 3IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 4Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 6Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China

First Author:

Jianlong Zhao  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China

Co-Author(s):

Tengda Zhao  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Yuehua Xu  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Hongming Li  
Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania|Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA|Philadelphia, PA
Lianglong Sun  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Xinyuan Liang  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Meizhen Han  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Zilong Zeng  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Yong He  
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University|Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University|IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University|Chinese Institute for Brain Research
Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China|Beijing, China

Introduction:

The neonatal human brain lays a critical neural foundation for establishing wide cognitive and behavioral abilities that last a lifetime[1-3]. However, how the individualized functional topography at birth evolves with age and supports later neurodevelopmental outcomes remain largely unclear. Here, we investigated the variability pattern of neonatal brain functional topography by combining individualized functional network and machine learning predictive models in neonatal large sample resting fMRI datasets.

Methods:

Based on 367 term-born neonates from the Developing Human Connectome Project[4], we firstly employed a regularized NMF approach to derive individualized functional networks for each neonate [5](Fig. 1A). Then we quantify the overall variability of functional topography across subjects based on median absolute deviations (Fig. 1B) and a fine-grained description of variability within each functional network (position, size, overlap, and region homogeneity) (Fig. 1C). Finally, we proposed a network-based SVR approach to delineate how individual functional topography of neonatal brain could predict brain maturation and cognitive, language, and motor function at 18 months (Fig. 1D). The network-wise feature weights were evaluated to understand the network contribution for predicting brain maturity and various behavior abilities. Cognitive, language, and motor development were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III).
Supporting Image: Fig_1_V2.jpg
 

Results:

We identified 11 functional networks for each neonate (Fig. 2A left). The highest between-subject variance is mainly located in association cortex while the lowest variance is located in primary cortex (Fig. 2A middle, right, Pspin < 0.05). The fine-grained description of variability pattern of the size, position, overlap, region homogeneity was similar to the voxel-level pattern (all index: Pspin < 0.05, Fig. 2B). However, there exist some indicator-specific distributions especially within the association system, such as the medial prefrontal cortex and temporal-parietal junction cortex. The network-based SVR model achieved a significant prediction for brain maturity and later cognition, language and motor performance at 18 months (age: r = 0.46; cognition: r = 0.39, language: r = 0.29, motor: r = 0.37; all Pperm < 0.001, Fig. 2C). To assess the effect of random fold assignment, we repeated this procedure 100 times by newly classifying all neonates into 10 subsets each time, which yielded highly consistent results (age: mean r = 0.51; cognition: mean r = 0.34; language: mean r = 0.27; motor: mean r = 0.34; all Pperm < 0.001, Fig. 2D). Finally, for predicting brain maturity and various behavior abilities, we found that high contributing networks are located consistently at primary motor networks and heterogeneous within association networks (Fig. 2E).
Supporting Image: Fig_2.jpg
 

Conclusions:

The results suggest that the variation pattern of neonatal primary networks is discernible from that of association networks. Critically, we demonstrated that individual variation of neonatal primary networks brain supports the accurate prediction of brain maturity and later cognition, language, and motor performance at 18 months. Individual variation of association networks contributes differentially to brain maturation and behavior prediction. Our results have implications for understanding how functional neuroanatomy at birth matures and supports the early establishment of neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Lifespan Development:

Normal Brain Development: Fetus to Adolescence 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Classification and Predictive Modeling
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 1

Neuroinformatics and Data Sharing:

Brain Atlases

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

BOLD fMRI

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Machine Learning
Modeling
Other - neonates; development; parcellation; topography;

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

Bressler, S. L. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 277-290.
Cui, Z. (2020). Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth. Neuron, 106(2), 340-353.e348.
Gilmore, J. H. (2018). Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(3), 123-137.
Laumann, T. O. (2015). Functional system and areal organization of a highly sampled individual human brain. Neuron, 87(3), 657-670.
Li, H. (2017). Large-scale sparse functional networks from resting state fMRI. NeuroImage, 156, 1-13.