Poster No:
1630
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Cecilia Jarne1, Ben Griffin2, Diego Vidaurre3
Institutions:
1Aarhus University CFIN /Universidad Nacional de Quilmes/ CONICET, Aarhus, Aarhus C, 2Oxford University, Oxford, Oxford, 3Aarhus University, Aarhus, Aarhus C
First Author:
Cecilia Jarne, PhD
Aarhus University CFIN /Universidad Nacional de Quilmes/ CONICET
Aarhus, Aarhus C
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
We address the prediction of behavioural or cognitive traits from brain EEG spectral data. To predict from individual channels, we proposed a novel method based on interpreting the EEG spectrogram as a probability distribution. Specifically, without predefining frequency bands or relying on manual feature engineering, the proposed approach uses so-called Kernel Mean Embeddings (KME) to represent EEG spectrograms in a high-dimensional feature space (Smola et. al, 2007; Iyer et. al, 2014; Borgwardt et. al, 2006). Our method, Kernel Mean Embedding Regression (KMER), utilises Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) as a distance metric on the space of probability measures, together with kernel ridge regression(Smola et. al, 2007; Saunders et al., 1998). As an example, we focus on age prediction, which can be used to explore how an individual's brain appears to have aged relative to the population average (Franke and Gaser, 2019; Smith et al, 2019. We demonstrate the effectiveness of KMER in age prediction using a multi-site resting-state EEG dataset spanning a wide age range.
Methods:
This study utilises EEG data from the HarMNqEEG dataset (Li et. al, 2022), where subjects were scanned across 14 sites, to predict individuals' age using three regression methods: Ridge Regression (RR), Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), and Kernel Mean Embedding Regression (KMER) (See Fig 1 for an illustration of how they work). In KMER, the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) is employed as a distance metric, interpreting EEG spectrograms as probability distributions. The MMD is estimated using different kernel functions to create a distance matrix. The predictive models KRR and KMER both incorporate the kernel trick for age prediction. We evaluated prediction performance using explained variance (R^2) and mean absolute error (MAE). The open-source code for this analysis is available on GitHub (Jarne et. al 2023).
Results:
KMER resulted in superior age prediction from EEG spectrograms compared to RR and KRR. KMER outperformed alternatives across all EEG channels, likely because of its capacity to capture non-linearities effectively (See Fig 2). KMER revealed that parietal sensors are the most accurate in predicting age. When predicting separately by sex, females demonstrated slightly higher prediction accuracy, suggesting a closer alignment of biological changes with chronological age. Predicting across 14 sites was harder than within site due to the wide range of age distributions. KMER, however, exhibited good accuracy and robust results even in this case.
Conclusions:
KMER was introduced as a method for predicting individual traits from EEG spectral information. Interpreting EEG channel spectrograms as probability distributions, leverages mathematical principles from kernel learning. KMER is straightforward to implement, computationally efficient, and broadly applicable.
Despite the challenge of predicting age across sites with very different age distributions and other potential differences, the presented results showcase notable performance in age prediction in comparison to previous EEG studies. Beyond its success in age prediction from EEG data, KMER can be used in other modalities, including MEG and fMRI, and to predict other subject traits besides age. Although here we restricted ourselves to the polynomial, Gaussian, and linear kernels, the method can be further optimised through the exploration of different kernel functions and hyperparameters.
Lifespan Development:
Early life, Adolescence, Aging
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Classification and Predictive Modeling
EEG/MEG Modeling and Analysis 1
Methods Development 2
Other Methods
Keywords:
Electroencephaolography (EEG)
Machine Learning
MEG
Modeling
Other - Kernel Methods
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Provide references using author date format
- Borgwardt, K. M., Gretton, A., Rasch, M. J., Kriegel, H.-P., Schölkopf, B., and Smola, A. J. (2006). Integrating structured biological data by Kernel Maximum Mean Discrepancy. Bioinformatics, 22(14):e49–e57.
- Franke, K. and Gaser, C. (2019). Ten years of brain age as a neuroimaging biomarker of brain aging: What insights have we gained? Frontiers in Neurology, 10(JUL).
- Iyer, A. S., Jagarlapudi, S., and Sarawagi, S. (2014). Maximum mean discrepancy for class ratio estimation: Convergence bounds and kernel selection. International Conference on Machine Learning.
- Jarne, C., Griffin, B., and Vidaurre, D. [8] (https://github.com/katejarne/Kernel_Max_mean_discrepancy_EEG_Age)
- Li, M., Wang, Y., Lopez-Naranjo, C., Hu, S., Reyes, R. C. G., Paz-Linares, D., Areces-Gonzalez, A., Hamid, A. I. A., Evans, A. C., Savostyanov, A. N., Calzada-Reyes, A., Villringer, A., Tobon-Quintero, C. A., Garcia-Agustin, D., Yao, D., Dong, L., Aubert-Vazquez, E., Reza, F., Razzaq, F. A., Omar, H., Abdullah, J. M., Galler, J. R., Ochoa-Gomez, J. F., Prichep, L. S., Galan-Garcia, L., Morales-Chacon, L., Valdes-Sosa, M. J., Tröndle, M. Zulkifly, M. F. M., Abdul Rahman, M. R. B., Milakhina, N. S., Langer, N., Rudych, P., Koenig, T., Virues-Alba, T. A., Lei, X., Bringas-Vega, M. L., Bosch-Bayard, J. F., and Valdes-Sosa, P. A. (2022). Harmonized-multinational qeeg norms (harmnqeeg). NeuroImage, 256:119190.
- Saunders, C., Gammerman, A., and Vovk, V. (1998). Ridge regression learning algorithm in dual variables. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 515–521. Morgan Kaufmann. Edited by J.Shavlik.
- Smola, A., Gretton, A., Song, L., and Schölkopf, B. (2007). A Hilbert space embedding for distributions. In Hutter, M., Servedio, R. A., and Takimoto, E., editors, Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 13–31, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Smith, S. M., Vidaurre, D., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Nichols, T. E., and Miller, K. L. (2019). Estimation of brain age delta from brain imaging. NeuroImage, 200:528–539.