Geometric deep learning for language prediction via pointwise tract microstructure analysis

Poster No:

2171 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Yuqian Chen1, Leo Zekelman1, Chaoyi Zhang2, Tengfei Xue2, Yang Song3, Nikos Makris1, Yogesh Rathi1, Alexandra Golby1, Weidong Cai2, Fan Zhang4, Lauren O'Donnell1

Institutions:

1Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 3University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 4University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan

First Author:

Yuqian Chen  
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA

Co-Author(s):

Leo Zekelman  
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Chaoyi Zhang  
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW
Tengfei Xue  
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW
Yang Song  
University of New South Wales
Sydney, New South Wales
Nikos Makris  
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Yogesh Rathi  
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Alexandra Golby  
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Weidong Cai  
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW
Fan Zhang  
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Chengdu, Sichuan
Lauren O'Donnell  
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA

Introduction:

The brain's white matter connections (fiber tracts) and their tissue microstructure can be quantitatively mapped using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) tractography [1], enabling the study of the brain's structural connectivity. To better understand how brain structure relates to function, recent research explores the prediction of individual cognitive performance based on structural neuroimaging data (such as dMRI) [2,3]. A critical challenge is how to represent white matter tracts to utilize their detailed microstructure and positional information instead of averaging or binning data along the streamline [3,4]. Another challenge is the improvement of performance in regression-based prediction and a potential direction is to utilize the intrinsic continuity in regression scores. In addition, the identification of predictive brain regions is a notable challenge drawing substantial attention [5]. Therefore, we propose a novel geometric deep learning framework, which includes a point cloud representation of tracts, a novel regression loss, and a critical region localization algorithm to predict language performance and identify predictive brain regions within tracts.

Methods:

The overview of our method is shown in Figure 1. Our method was evaluated on dMRI data and two language assessment scores, the NIH Toolbox Picture Vocabulary Test (TPVT) and the Toolbox Oral Reading Recognition Test (TORRT) [6], from 809 subjects of the Human Connectome Project [7]. Whole brain tractography was generated from dMRI using a two-tensor unscented Kalman filter method [8], followed by the identification of white matter tracts. The left arcuate fasciculus (AF) and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) were selected for prediction due to their relationship to language.
Each white matter tract was represented as a point cloud (Figure 1). Each point was characterized by three spatial coordinates and two additional measurements (fractional anisotropy and number of streamlines). During each training iteration, the input of the network was formed by randomly sampling points from the cloud.
We designed a Siamese network [9] that contains two PointNet-based [10] subnetworks with shared weights. To utilize the information of continuous language scores, we propose a novel regression loss that constrains the difference between the predicted scores of the input pair to be the same as the difference between the ground truth scores.
We propose a Critical Region Localization algorithm to identify critical regions within fiber tracts for language score prediction. First, the subject-wise contributing points are identified as point sets that contribute to the max-pooled features. Then group-wise analysis is performed to localize critical regions that are consistently important for prediction across testing subjects.
Supporting Image: Figure1.PNG
 

Results:

The popular Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was adopted as the evaluation metric of prediction performance [2,3]. We compared our proposed method with several baseline methods that use different tract representations (mean value and AFQ [4]). For TPVT, the r values of our method, mean value and AFQ are 0.33, 0.15 and 0.16 for left AF, and 0.33, 0.25, 0.09 for left ILF. For TORRT, the r values are 0.36, 0.14 and 0.17 for left AF, and 0.33, 0.25 and 0.15 for left ILF. Therefore, our approach consistently outperformed baseline methods across both fiber tracts for both prediction tasks, as demonstrated by higher r values. Critical predictive regions, as shown in Figure 2, were distributed across the left hemisphere and all cerebral lobes for both assessments.
Supporting Image: Figure2.png
 

Conclusions:

In this work, we propose a novel geometric deep learning framework for the prediction of language scores using white matter tracts represented as point clouds. Evaluated on a large-scale public dataset, our method showed superior prediction performance and successfully identified brain regions highly predictive of language scores.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Classification and Predictive Modeling 2
Diffusion MRI Modeling and Analysis

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

White Matter Anatomy, Fiber Pathways and Connectivity 1

Keywords:

Machine Learning
MRI
Tractography
White Matter

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

Chopra, S., Hadsell, R. and LeCun, Y. (2005) ‘Learning a Similarity Metric Discriminatively, with Application to Face Verification’, in IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), pp. 539–546.
Feng, G. et al. (2022) ‘Methodological evaluation of individual cognitive prediction based on the brain white matter structural connectome’, Human brain mapping, 43(12), pp. 3775–3791.
Gong, W., Beckmann, C.F. and Smith, S.M. (2021) ‘Phenotype discovery from population brain imaging’, Medical image analysis, 71, p. 102050.
Jiang, R. et al. (2022) ‘Interpreting Brain Biomarkers: Challenges and solutions in interpreting machine learning-based predictive neuroimaging’, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 39(4), pp. 107–118.
Malcolm, J.G., Shenton, M.E. and Rathi, Y. (2010) ‘Filtered multitensor tractography’, IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 29(9), pp. 1664–1675.
Qi, C.R. et al. (2017) ‘Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation’, in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 652–660.
Suárez, L.E. et al. (2020) ‘Linking Structure and Function in Macroscale Brain Networks’, Trends in cognitive sciences, 24(4), pp. 302–315.
Weintraub, S. et al. (2013) ‘Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox’, Neurology, 80(11 Suppl 3), pp. S54–64.
Yeatman, J.D. et al. (2012) ‘Tract profiles of white matter properties: automating fiber-tract quantification’, PloS one, 7(11), p. e49790.
Zhang, F. et al. (2022) ‘Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review’, NeuroImage, 249, p. 118870.