Poster No:
1282
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Xinran Wu1, Xiangzhen Kong2, Lena Palaniyappan3, Gunter Schumann4, Jianfeng Feng5, Jie Zhang6
Institutions:
1Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, 2Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 3Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia, Parkville, Victoria, 4Centre for Population Neuroscience and Stratified Medicine (PONS), Fudan University and Charite, Shanghai, Shanghai, 5Institute of Science and Technology for Brain inspired Intelligence, Shanghai, Shanghai, 6Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence (ISTBI), Shanghai, Shanghai
First Author:
Xinran Wu
Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai
Co-Author(s):
Xiangzhen Kong
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Lena Palaniyappan
Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia
Parkville, Victoria
Gunter Schumann
Centre for Population Neuroscience and Stratified Medicine (PONS), Fudan University and Charite
Shanghai, Shanghai
Jianfeng Feng
Institute of Science and Technology for Brain inspired Intelligence
Shanghai, Shanghai
Jie Zhang
Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence (ISTBI)
Shanghai, Shanghai
Introduction:
Hemispheric asymmetry is a fundamental aspect of human brain organization (Duboc et al., 2015), yet its developmental processes remain poorly understood. Unique asymmetrical patterns have been identified in cortical surface area (CSA) and cortical thickness (CT) (Kong et al., 2018), and undergoing various developmental changes with age (Roe et al., 2023). Abnormal alterations in asymmetry have been linked to certain neurodevelopmental disorders in adolescents, such as autism (Postema et al., 2019), underscoring the significance of comprehending the asymmetric development of the brain for overall brain health. However, the current study exclusively delineated the trajectories of asymmetry development for different features, and the correlation between the asymmetry development of distinct modalities remains incompletely understood.
Methods:
This study investigates brain structural asymmetry development, genetic factors, and cognitive/psychiatric associations in youths. We used MRI data from two longitudinal datasets: Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (N>11,000, 2 time points: 10 and 12 years) and IMAGEN study (N>2,000, 3 time points: 14, 19, 22 years). Asymmetry indices (AI) from CT, CSA, and subcortical volume were assessed with linear mixed models (LMM) for age-related effects. Cognitive processes associated with CSA and CT asymmetry developmental pattern were determined through a Neurosynth-based meta-analysis. Besides, the associations between AI and cognitive / psychiatric phenotype were investigated using LMM. Finally, genetic association analysis (GWAS), gene enrichment analysis, and temporal expression analysis using BrainSpan dataset were performed on ABCD genetic sequencing data to investigate genetic factors influencing CSA and CT asymmetry and its changing rates (ΔAI) from ages 10 to 12.
Results:
Despite baseline CT and CSA AI pattern differences with each other (Fig 1A), CT and CSA asymmetry showed similar developmental trajectories: Frontal and temporal regions exhibited increasing left-lateralization with age (Fig 1B, C), which associated with language and emotion functions (by Neurosynth, Fig 1D, E). Age-related changes in CSA and CT within these regions indicated that asymmetry development was driven by more rapid CSA and CT reduction in the right frontotemporal regions during adolescence than their left homotopic regions. Phenotype association analysis suggested prolonged CT asymmetry development in the superior frontal cortex (less leftward than peers) related to better cognitive function (Fig 2A). Genetic analysis revealed more genes linked to ΔAI than AI, and enrichment analysis revealed the genes influencing both CSA and CT ΔAI primarily associated with neural and synapse development (Fig 2B, C, D); besides, these genes had increased expression upon adolescence (especially in frontal lobe) (Fig2 E).
Conclusions:
In summary, this study showed that despite CSA and CT were influenced by distinct developmental and genetic mechanism, a similar co-developmental trajectory still exists between asymmetry of the two different morphological features, primarily in frontotemporal regions. This shared trajectory may result from common biological pathways in adolescent brain like synaptic pruning and dendritic changes affecting both CSA and CT. Leftward development in these regions may underlie advanced cognitive abilities, including language. Prolonged cortical thickness asymmetry growth in superior frontal gyrus correlated with higher cognitive abilities, which might suggest more neural plastic and less inflammation (Tooley, Bassett, & Mackey, 2021) that can preserve neurons and synapses, and finally enhanced brain function. These findings hold important implications for understanding normal and abnormal brain development.
Lifespan Development:
Early life, Adolescence, Aging
Normal Brain Development: Fetus to Adolescence 1
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Cortical Anatomy and Brain Mapping 2
Normal Development
Keywords:
Cortex
Development
Hemispheric Specialization
Morphometrics
MRI
NORMAL HUMAN
PEDIATRIC
Phenotype-Genotype
STRUCTURAL MRI
1|2Indicates the priority used for review

·Developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and surface area.

·Behavioral phenotype association analysis and genetic analysis
Provide references using author date format
Duboc, V., Dufourcq, P., Blader, P., & Roussigné, M. (2015). 'Asymmetry of the Brain: Development and Implications'. Annual Review of Genetics, vol 49(1), pp. 647-672.
Kong, X.-Z., Mathias, S. R., Guadalupe, T., Glahn, D. C., Franke, B., Crivello, F., . . . Francks, C. (2018). 'Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17,141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium'. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(22), E5154-E5163.
Postema, M. C., van Rooij, D., Anagnostou, E., Arango, C., Auzias, G., Behrmann, M., . . . Francks, C. (2019). 'Altered structural brain asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder in a study of 54 datasets'. Nat Commun, 10(1), 4958.
Roe, J. M., Vidal-Pineiro, D., Amlien, I. K., Pan, M., Sneve, M. H., Thiebaut de Schotten, M., . . . Westerhausen, R. (2023). 'Tracing the development and lifespan change of population-level structural asymmetry in the cerebral cortex'. Elife, 12, e84685. doi:10.7554/eLife.84685
Tooley, U. A., Bassett, D. S., & Mackey, A. P. (2021). 'Environmental influences on the pace of brain development'. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22(6), 372-384.