Intrinsic Structural Covariation Links 28 Cerebellum Sub-Regions to the Cerebral Cortex

Poster No:

1957 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Zilong Wang1, Jörn Diedrichsen2, Karin Saltoun1, Christopher Steele3,4, Sheeba Arnold-Anteraper5,6,7, Jeremy Schmahmann8, Danilo Bzdok1

Institutions:

1McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (BIC), Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, 2The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, 3Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Quebec, 4Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 5Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 6Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, 7Alan and Lorraine Bressler Clinical and Research Program for Autism Spectrum Disorder, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 8Ataxia Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

First Author:

Zilong Wang  
McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (BIC), Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University
Montréal, Quebec

Co-Author(s):

Jörn Diedrichsen  
The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario
Karin Saltoun  
McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (BIC), Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University
Montréal, Quebec
Christopher Steele  
Department of Psychology, Concordia University|Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Montréal, Quebec|Leipzig, Germany
Sheeba Anteraper, PhD  
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University|Carle Foundation Hospital|Alan and Lorraine Bressler Clinical and Research Program for Autism Spectrum Disorder, Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, MA|Urbana, IL|Boston, MA
Jeremy Schmahmann  
Ataxia Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Danilo Bzdok  
McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (BIC), Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University
Montréal, Quebec

Introduction:

The cerebellum, long associated solely with motor control and skill acquisition, is now understood to play a role in non-motor and higher cognitive functions1. Tract-tracing studies in monkeys have shown distinct cortico-cerebellar circuits for areas like the prefrontal and somatomotor cortex2, but similar invasive studies are infeasible in humans and impossible to scale to the whole brain3. Evolutionarily, the associative cortical and cerebellar regions enlarge in humans, compared to other species4. Human development aligns with evolutionary evidence such that regions supporting higher cognition in the cortex and the cerebellum mature later in life5. However, this "big" and "small" cortex of the human brain were routinely studied in isolation. Efforts to parcel the cerebellum mainly take a winner-takes-all approach6, allowing only one possibility about the functional organization of the cerebellum, which may lead to an incomplete view. We hypothesize that there are multiple structural variation patterns that occur simultaneously and are spread throughout the cortex-cerebellum complex. We also hypothesize that each cerebellar subregion can be linked to several brain phenomena at the same time, and vice versa.

Methods:

We leveraged structural whole-brain scans and 977 in-depth phenotype measurements for 38527 individuals from UKBB cohort. We parcellated the entire cerebellar cortex into 28 regions with a new functional atlas7, and segmented the cerebral cortex into 100 subregions 8. Using partial least squares regression (PLSR), we estimated their structural covariation patterns (modes) at the population level. Each derived mode characterized a latent cortical score and cerebellar score that represented linear combinations of the original cortical and cerebellar measurements with maximal covariance. Robustness of the modes was determined by permutation test. We further profiled the key phenotypes associated with each mode's latent variables to understand their real-world implications by means of phenome-wide association assays.

Results:

Our analysis uncovered three significant population-level cortex-cerebellum covariation modes. The first and most explanatory mode revealed the interplay between broad higher-associative regions, excluding dorsal attention network (DAN), and visual, sensorimotor regions in both the cortex and cerebellum (Fig.1A). The cortical latent variable in the first mode was linked to complex reasoning, cardiovascular dieases, while the cerebellar latent variable was associated with psychomotor speed, physical activity and angiogenesis (Fig.2A). The second mode contrasted visual regions and key nodes in DAN with frontal, anterior temporal associative regions implicated in default, limbic, executive control and salience network (Fig.1B). Both its latent variables were strongly associated with watching TV and complex reasoning (Fig.2B). The third mode showed an ipsilateral pattern such that each side of cerebellum varied in the same direction as the ipsilateral side of the cortex, with few exceptions (Fig.1C).
Supporting Image: Fig1OHBM2024.png
Supporting Image: ohbm2024fig2.png
 

Conclusions:

Our first two modes are consistent with the higher-lower divergence of neural systems, as well as the classical double motor representation and the recently proposed triple nonmotor representation in the cerebellum 9. Our results support the anticorrelation between visual-attention and other higher order cognitive systems in the cerebellum, like in the cortex. Our third mode indicates a greater proportion of ipsilateral mechanisms between the cerebellum and cortex that may be overshadowed by the contralateral pathways. The distinct phenotype profiles for each mode and their latent variables revealed unique brain phenomena - behavior links that weighed differently in the cerebellum and the cortex. These findings greatly contribute to our understanding of the intricate interplay among the cortex, cerebellum and behaviors.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2
Multivariate Approaches 1

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

Anatomy and Functional Systems
Cortical Anatomy and Brain Mapping

Neuroinformatics and Data Sharing:

Brain Atlases

Keywords:

Cerebellum
Computational Neuroscience
Cortex
Data analysis
Machine Learning
MRI
Phenotype-Genotype
Statistical Methods
Structures
Systems

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Leiner, H. C. (1989). Reappraising the cerebellum: What does the hindbrain contribute to the forebrain? Behavioral Neuroscience, 103(5), 998-1008.
2. Kelly, R. M. (2003). Cerebellar Loops with Motor Cortex and Prefrontal Cortex of a Nonhuman Primate. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(23), 8432-8444.
3. Bohland, J. W. (2009). A Proposal for a Coordinated Effort for the Determination of Brainwide Neuroanatomical Connectivity in Model Organisms at a Mesoscopic Scale. PLOS Computational Biology, 5(3), e1000334.
4. Hill, J. (2010). Similar patterns of cortical expansion during human development and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107(29), 13135-13140.
5. Liu, X. (2022). A multifaceted gradient in human cerebellum of structural and functional development. Nat Neurosci, 25(9), 1129-1133.
6. Buckner, R. L. (2011). The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol, 106(5), 2322-2345.
7. Zhi, D. (2023). A hierarchical Bayesian brain parcellation framework for fusion of functional imaging datasets. bioRxiv, 2023.2005.2024.542121.
8. Schaefer, A. (2018). Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI. Cereb Cortex, 28(9), 3095-3114.
9. Guell, X. (2018). Functional gradients of the cerebellum. Elife, 7.